Bruno Haible wrote:
Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
Essentially, this would be an automated release building service: upon
request, make a Git checkout, run autogen.sh or equivalent, make dist,
and publish or hash the result. The problem is that an attacker who
manages to gain commit access
* Such an automated release building service is a piece of SaaSS.
CI is not SaaSS, how is it different?
I can
hardly imagine how we at GNU tell people "SaaSS is as bad as, or worse
than, proprietary software" and at the same time advocate the use of
such
I am not arguing for the building service, but:
On 2024-04-01 14:40:20 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> * Such an automated release building service is a piece of SaaSS. I can
> hardly imagine how we at GNU tell people "SaaSS is as bad as, or worse
> than, proprietary software&qu
Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> >> Essentially, this would be an automated release building service: upon
> >> request, make a Git checkout, run autogen.sh or equivalent, make dist,
> >> and publish or hash the result. The problem is that an attacker who
> &g
