On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:00 AM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:04 AM, tsuna wrote:
>> What would be nice would be to have the ability to recompile only the
>> .java that changed. So when you edit 2/3 files, then we'd build just
>> that, but in one command.
>
> make can handle th
On Wednesday 27 July 2011, NightStrike wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:04 AM, tsuna wrote:
> > What would be nice would be to have the ability to recompile only the
> > .java that changed. So when you edit 2/3 files, then we'd build just
> > that, but in one command.
>
> make can handle this
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:04 AM, tsuna wrote:
> What would be nice would be to have the ability to recompile only the
> .java that changed. So when you edit 2/3 files, then we'd build just
> that, but in one command.
make can handle this pretty well. If all the source files are listed
as prereq
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Ralf Wildenhues
wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:58:01AM CEST:
>> I'd rather deprecate the JAVA primary, and then introduce a new `JARS'
>> primary, to be used e.g. as follows:
>
> First off, we've _never_ removed support for a primary
Hi Jack,
* Jack Kelly wrote on Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 09:33:58AM CEST:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Jack Kelly wrote on Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 06:13:58AM CEST:
> >> Perhaps there should be support for a foo_jar_JARADD, that by analogy
> >> to _LDADD, that specifies a
Jack,
-Original Message-
From: automake-bounces+john.calcote=gmail@gnu.org
[mailto:automake-bounces+john.calcote=gmail@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jack
Kelly
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 1:34 AM
To: Ralf Wildenhues
Cc: 9...@debbugs.gnu.org; automake@gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#9088: Java
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Jack Kelly wrote on Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 06:13:58AM CEST:
>> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:55 AM, tsuna wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> >> As my java foo is pretty weak, I'm not sure how to handle jar
* Jack Kelly wrote on Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 06:13:58AM CEST:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:55 AM, tsuna wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> >> As my java foo is pretty weak, I'm not sure how to handle jar manifests,
> >> jar entry points, or other jar/javac subtletie
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:55 AM, tsuna wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Stefano Lattarini
> wrote:
>> As my java foo is pretty weak, I'm not sure how to handle jar manifests,
>> jar entry points, or other jar/javac subtleties and advanced features.
>> Suggestions welcome.
>
> You can cre
On Saturday 16 July 2011, tsuna wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Stefano Lattarini
> wrote:
> > You're right; the documentation on Java support should be definitely
> > be improved (especially making better distinction between usual bytecode
> > compilation with javac and "native/binary
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Jack Kelly wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:55 AM, tsuna wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Stefano Lattarini
>> wrote:
>>> As my java foo is pretty weak, I'm not sure how to handle jar manifests,
>>> jar entry points, or other jar/javac subtleties and
11 matches
Mail list logo
