Is there any support in automake for building a binary that will only be
used during the build process?
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Robert Collins wrote:
yes,
noinst_PROGRAMS = convenience_binaries
Can these convenience programs be built for the host arch in a
cross-compiled environment?
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 21:22, Warren Turkal wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
yes,
noinst_PROGRAMS = convenience_binaries
Can these convenience programs be built for the host arch in a
cross-compiled environment?
probably, you'll likely need to override the default build recipe
though.. I
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 13:22, Warren Turkal wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
yes,
noinst_PROGRAMS = convenience_binaries
Can these convenience programs be built for the host arch in a
cross-compiled environment?
No, not without further assistance.
autoconf and automake do not support mixing
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:01:24PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 21:22, Warren Turkal wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
yes,
noinst_PROGRAMS = convenience_binaries
Can these convenience programs be built for the host arch in a
cross-compiled environment?
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 22:31, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:01:24PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 21:22, Warren Turkal wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
yes,
noinst_PROGRAMS = convenience_binaries
Can these convenience programs be built for
Yes. At least for libraries. For libtool you use noinst_LTLIBRARIES to
create convenience libraries. These are often used as intermediate
libraries for a series of object files that are later on included in a
final executable or library which /will/ be installed.
Regards,
Sander
On maandag,
Andrew == Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Andrew Can it ever be correct for a noinst object to be built for the target
Andrew environment?
Yes. noinst_ tells Automake not to define rules to install
them. For instance these might be programs that are installed
with a custom
Robert Collins wrote:
Not necessarily - but certainly the common case is for them to be build
system only.
Maybe we should consider adding something like host_PROGRAMS. Just to let
you all know why I need this, I am converting libX11 from XFree86 to use
autotools for the Freedesktop.org
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 23:54, Warren Turkal wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
Not necessarily - but certainly the common case is for them to be build
system only.
Maybe we should consider adding something like host_PROGRAMS. Just to let
you all know why I need this, I am converting libX11 from
10 matches
Mail list logo
