Re: development work flow

2010-01-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Martin, * Martin Kalbfuß wrote on Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 10:59:52PM CET: > I like to know if > > make & make install & program_name > > is the typically development work flow. For many developers, I guess so. (If you meant the above literally, then you ne

Re: development work flow

2010-01-10 Thread Russ Allbery
Bob Friesenhahn writes: > In traditional Unix, programs get installed under a specified prefix > (e.g. /usr/local) and if the program needs additional data files > (e.g. under /usr/local/share/appname), then the full path to the directory > containing these files is cached in a config.h file. Be

Re: development work flow

2010-01-10 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Martin Kalbfuß wrote: make & make install & program_name is the typically development work flow. I'm not sure if the program should get installed. If not, I don't know how to the program should find the data files properly. I'm generally not sure h

development work flow

2010-01-10 Thread Martin Kalbfuß
Hi, I like to know if make & make install & program_name is the typically development work flow. I'm not sure if the program should get installed. If not, I don't know how to the program should find the data files properly. I'm generally not sure how the compiled progra