Re: false positive result with 'make distcheck'

2006-11-10 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, regarding the problem discussed earlier in this thread: On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 06:17:20PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Now, even when you stick "$(srcdir)/" in front of the prerequisites, > still VPATH searching applies. Since source tree of the distcheck > source (that below /tmp/rpm

Re: false positive result with 'make distcheck'

2006-09-07 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Now, even when you stick "$(srcdir)/" in front of the prerequisites, > still VPATH searching applies. Since source tree of the distcheck > source (that below /tmp/rpmbuildupdate-0.7/rpmbuildupdate-0.7) does > not contain the *.in files, but VPATH contains "..", the `make'

Re: false positive result with 'make distcheck'

2006-09-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Harlan Stenn wrote on Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 08:28:01AM CEST: > > > > Two ways to get out of this: > > > > - do not stick $(srcdir)/ in front of the prerequisites. For example, > > > > this should work portably (if you take care not to stick $(srcdir)/ > > > > elsewhere before the *.in files):

Re: false positive result with 'make distcheck'

2006-09-05 Thread Harlan Stenn
Hi Ralf, > > > Two ways to get out of this: > > > - do not stick $(srcdir)/ in front of the prerequisites. For example, > > > this should work portably (if you take care not to stick $(srcdir)/ > > > elsewhere before the *.in files): > > > > > > rpmbuildupdate: rpmbuildupdate.in > > > perl

Re: false positive result with 'make distcheck'

2006-09-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Harlan, * Harlan Stenn wrote on Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 10:00:55PM CEST: > Ralf writes: > > > > Two ways to get out of this: > > - do not stick $(srcdir)/ in front of the prerequisites. For example, > > this should work portably (if you take care not to stick $(srcdir)/ > > elsewhere befo

Re: false positive result with 'make distcheck'

2006-09-05 Thread Harlan Stenn
Ralf writes: ,,, > Now, even when you stick "$(srcdir)/" in front of the prerequisites, > still VPATH searching applies. Since source tree of the distcheck > source (that below /tmp/rpmbuildupdate-0.7/rpmbuildupdate-0.7) does > not contain the *.in files, but VPATH contains "..", the `make' exec

Re: false positive result with 'make distcheck'

2006-09-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Guillaume, * Guillaume Rousse wrote on Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 05:53:59PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Could you make a tarball exposing the bug you see available? > http://www.zarb.org/~guillomovitch/rpmbuildupdate-0.7.tar.gz Thanks. What an interesting failure. See more below. > > S

Re: false positive result with 'make distcheck'

2006-09-05 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Could you make a tarball exposing the bug you see available? http://www.zarb.org/~guillomovitch/rpmbuildupdate-0.7.tar.gz > Some minor nits: > >> rpmbuildupdate: $(srcdir)/rpmbuildupdate.in >> perl -pi -e s'|[EMAIL PROTECTED]@|$(sysconfdir)|' < $< > $@ >> >> rpmbuild

Re: false positive result with 'make distcheck'

2006-09-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Guillaume, * Guillaume Rousse wrote on Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:33:06PM CEST: > Using the following Makefile.am, make distcheck report everything's OK. > > However, the main files, rpmbuildupdate.in rand pmbuildupdate.comp.in > are obviously missing, as I forgot to list them in EXTRA_DIST. >

Re: false positive result with 'make distcheck'

2006-09-05 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Guillaume Rousse wrote: > Using the following Makefile.am, make distcheck report everything's OK. > > However, the main files, rpmbuildupdate.in rand pmbuildupdate.comp.in > are obviously missing, as I forgot to list them in EXTRA_DIST. > > Is this a bug, or am I missing something ? I forgot: I'm

false positive result with 'make distcheck'

2006-09-05 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Using the following Makefile.am, make distcheck report everything's OK. However, the main files, rpmbuildupdate.in rand pmbuildupdate.comp.in are obviously missing, as I forgot to list them in EXTRA_DIST. Is this a bug, or am I missing something ? -- Guillaume Rousse Projet Estime, INRIA Domaine