* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:07:00AM CEST:
> I think that one of the points of C# is not to have "real .so files". C#
> and .net's JIT linkage and compilation seem to go hand in hand. C#
> should produce something similar to .net assemblies. These are rather
> similar t
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
It seems like what is needed is C# support in libtool. This should be
discussed on the libtool list.[...]
It's about time GNU comes up with a Mono compiler, similar to gcj.
Then you can have real .so files :)
I think that one of the points of C# is
On Sunday 2009-05-24 19:35, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 2009, Andreas Otto wrote:
>>
>> I want to create an language binding for a "C" libraray
>>
>> this mean I have as input an file called "csmsgque.cs"
>> and get as output an "csmsgque.dll" on unix
>
> It seems like what i
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Andreas Otto wrote:
I want to create an language binding for a "C" libraray
this mean I have as input an file called "csmsgque.cs"
and get as output an "csmsgque.dll" on unix
It seems like what is needed is C# support in libtool. This should be
discusse
Hi,
I want to create an language binding for a "C" libraray
this mean I have as input an file called "csmsgque.cs"
and get as output an "csmsgque.dll" on unix
My current makefile looks like:
=
.dll.cs:
mkdir .libs
