Automatic regeneration of libtool

2004-02-24 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The libtool manual currently states: ~ This macro also sets the shell variable LIBTOOL_DEPS, that you can ~ use to automatically update the libtool script if it becomes ~ out-of-date. In order to do that, add to your `configure.in': ~

Target-specific CFLAGS

2004-02-24 Thread Drummonds, Scott B
Hi, everyone, A couple of weeks back I posted my problems with getting an ancient version of Automake to build two libraries. Each was to use the same source but one should have it's objects compiled with -DFEATURE. I attempted to use the following setup: quote noinst_LIBRARIES = normal.a

RE: Target-specific CFLAGS

2004-02-24 Thread Drummonds, Scott B
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] quote noinst_LIBRARIES = normal.a normal-feature.a normal_a_SOURCES = [bunch of files] normal_feature_a_SOURCES = $(normal_a_SOURCES) normal_feature_a_CFLAGS = -DFEATURE /quote ... Where have I gone wrong? Of course, when my source files are C++ files the _CFLAGS

Re: Target-specific CFLAGS

2004-02-24 Thread Ben Pfaff
Drummonds, Scott B [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] quote noinst_LIBRARIES = normal.a normal-feature.a normal_a_SOURCES = [bunch of files] normal_feature_a_SOURCES = $(normal_a_SOURCES) normal_feature_a_CFLAGS = -DFEATURE /quote ... Where have I gone wrong? Of

RE: Target-specific CFLAGS

2004-02-24 Thread Drummonds, Scott B
I didn't. But I do now. Thanks, Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Pfaff Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 1:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Target-specific CFLAGS Drummonds, Scott B [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Re: Target-specific CFLAGS

2004-02-24 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Ben Pfaff wrote: Of course, when my source files are C++ files the _CFLAGS extension does nothing. Changing this to _CPPFLAGS fixed the problem. Duh. You know that CPPFLAGS is for the C preprocessor and CXXFLAGS is for the C++ compiler, right? This distinction is

Re: Target-specific CFLAGS

2004-02-24 Thread Ben Pfaff
Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Ben Pfaff wrote: Of course, when my source files are C++ files the _CFLAGS extension does nothing. Changing this to _CPPFLAGS fixed the problem. Duh. You know that CPPFLAGS is for the C preprocessor and CXXFLAGS is for the

Re: Target-specific CFLAGS

2004-02-24 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Ben Pfaff wrote: Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Ben Pfaff wrote: Of course, when my source files are C++ files the _CFLAGS extension does nothing. Changing this to _CPPFLAGS fixed the problem. Duh. You know that CPPFLAGS is

Extra recursive targets

2004-02-24 Thread Andreas Schwab
Is there a way to add additional recursive targets to a makefile? I tried to use RECURSIVE_TARGETS += foo-recursive but automake complains about the use of `+='. When changing that to a simple `=' the generated makefile has only foo-recursive as RECURSIVE_TARGETS. Andreas. -- Andreas