%% Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ad Finally, note that you are allowed to ask config.status to perform
ad substitutions on files it doesn't know[1]. In your case, I'm unsure
ad binding the instantiation to configure instead of make is right.
Doh!
I thought this would be the
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
[Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert == Robert Lowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert Hi!
Robert I have a set of common headers files in includes/ and the following
Robert line in configure.ac:
Robert AC_SUBST(CPPFLAGS,[-I../includes])
Should be
* Paul Smith wrote on Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 08:25:56PM CET:
%% Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ad Finally, note that you are allowed to ask config.status to perform
ad substitutions on files it doesn't know[1]. In your case, I'm unsure
ad binding the instantiation to configure
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 10:03:27AM CET:
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 09:28:17AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
AC_OUTPUT
touch foo.in
./config.status --file foo
why the ``touch''? (./config.status doesn't check the timestamps.)
Oh, that was just copy-n-paste
%% Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I suppose I could tell those folks to run the config.status step by
hand, but I'd really like to get this built through the configure
script. Ideas?
rw dnl ...
rw AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile])
rw AC_OUTPUT
rw touch foo.in
rw
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 06:55:23AM +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
Dale AC_SUBST(CXX)
This is superfluous if you already call AC_PROG_CXX.
OK, I've wondered about that.
Dale AC_SUBST(CXXLINK)
This will override the Automake definition of this variable with
the configure definition
Maybe someone can figure out a better error message, please?
For those that found *this* message because of the subject line:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2004-07/msg00083.html
Stephan although AC_PROG_LIBTOOL _is_ present in configure.ac.
Therefore it means
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:57:50PM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
Subject: 29,
900 English pages for Libtool library used but LIBTOOL is undefined
google is exaggerating, of course.
When you enter
Libtool library used but LIBTOOL is undefined
with the quotes, you only get 76
On Monday 06 December 2004 01:18 pm, Stepan Kasal wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:57:50PM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
Subject: 29,
900 English pages for Libtool library used but LIBTOOL is undefined
google is exaggerating, of course.
Of course it is. That doesn't mean that the
