On 2 Mar 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2000, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | On Mar 1, 2000, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > |
> > | > Don't use `ln' (which was just a space optimization anyway)
> > |
Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mar 2, 2000, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > That'd be ok if there were a compelling reason to continue using such
| > hacks, but in any case, please don't advocate use of -exec in cases
| > like this. Using xargs is more efficient:
|
On Mar 2, 2000, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | On Mar 1, 2000, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |
> | > Don't use `ln' (which was just a space optimization anyway)
> |
> | A worthwhile optimization, IMO.
> Worthwhile? Why?
[ On , March 2, 2000 at 10:32:57 (+0100), Jim Meyering wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Automake security problem
>
> Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | On Mar 1, 2000, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |
> | > Don't use `ln' (which was just a space optimization anyway)
> |
> | A wor
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Hal" == Duston, Hal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Hal> I am setting my package up with automake/autoconf, and want to
| Hal> provide gnu getopt if it is not available. I noticed
| Hal> AC_REPLACE_GNU_GETOPT in the info file, but it doesn't seem t
Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Mar 1, 2000, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| > Don't use `ln' (which was just a space optimization anyway)
|
| A worthwhile optimization, IMO. There are some `find' hacks in the
Worthwhile? Why? Sure it saves space for the `dist'
