> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I've always been annoyed that automake --add-missing --copy
Lars> doesn't pass the "--copy"-option along to libtoolize, so I end
Lars> up with symlinked config.guess, config.sub, ltconfig and
Lars> ltmain.sh.
Fixed.
Lars> This might b
> "Fred" == F Labrosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Fred> Is it possible to test for a library using $CXX instead of $CC?
Fred> My problem is that on a Solaris box, some libraries won't link
Fred> with cc while they do with CC (e.g. qt).
Can't you set the language to C++ and then test?
Seems
On Apr 5, 2000, F Labrosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to test for a library using $CXX instead of $CC?
This is an `autoconf', not `automake', question. See the `Language
Choice' node in the autoconf manual.
--
Alexandre OlivaEnjoy Guaraná, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~o
[[ Note to pretesters: until the tar file is available on ftp.gnu.org
you can access it via ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/make/make-3.79.tar.gz ]]
GNU Make version 3.79 is now available for download.
The `make' utility automates the process of compilation. When the source
files of a large program
Hi all,
Is it possible to test for a library using $CXX instead of $CC? My problem
is that on a Solaris box, some libraries won't link with cc while they do
with CC (e.g. qt).
Or is it better to set $CC to CC (instead of having $CC=cc and $CXX=CC).
TIA,
Fred
Geoff Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I need some help on writing a rather strange autoconf test. If this seems
| painfully obvious, I'm sorry, I'm just drawing a blank.
|
| My GPL'ed package includes the glibc regex.c source. Right now, this
| causes segfaults on BSDI and Digital Unix. I'
