Re: Pass additional options to libtool?

On Apr 6, 2000, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6 Apr 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> On Apr 6, 2000, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > What is the approved mechanism to selectively pass additional options >> > to libtool from Automake? >> >> I don't think we

Re: Pass additional options to libtool?

On 6 Apr 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Apr 6, 2000, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What is the approved mechanism to selectively pass additional options > > to libtool from Automake? > > I don't think we have one so far. But this should work: > > LIBTOOL = @LIBTOOL@ --s

Re: Pass additional options to libtool?

On Apr 6, 2000, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the approved mechanism to selectively pass additional options > to libtool from Automake? I don't think we have one so far. But this should work: LIBTOOL = @LIBTOOL@ --silent -- Alexandre OlivaEnjoy Guaraná, see http:/

Pass additional options to libtool?

What is the approved mechanism to selectively pass additional options to libtool from Automake? I would like to pass the --silent option to libtool when installing dynamically loadable modules in order to avoid the useless (for modules) informational messages. Thanks, Bob ==

Re: Testing for a library with a function different from main() (Was: Testing for a library with $CXX (instead of $CC))

Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > "Morten" == Morten Eriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Morten> BTW, I've already written a pretty extensive Qt-check macro. Feel free > Morten> to check it out, its part of our SoQt distribution at > Morten> http://www.sim.no/coin.html>, or just

Re: Testing for a library with a function different from main() (Was: Testing for a library with $CXX (instead of $CC))

> "Morten" == Morten Eriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Morten> BTW, I've already written a pretty extensive Qt-check macro. Feel free Morten> to check it out, its part of our SoQt distribution at Morten> http://www.sim.no/coin.html>, or just do: Why not submit it to the autoconf macro arch

Re: automake --add-missing --copy

On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 01:49:35PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: : > "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Lars> I've always been annoyed that automake --add-missing --copy : Lars> doesn't pass the "--copy"-option along to libtoolize, so I end : Lars> up with symlinked config.guess, co

Re: Testing for a library with a function different from main() (Was: Testing for a library with $CXX (instead of $CC))

F Labrosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [snip] > No I have the following problem. When I check for qt with: > > AC_CHECK_LIB(qt, main, [snip] I had the exact same problem. Solved it by using AC_TRY_LINK instead. BTW, I've already written a pretty extensive Qt-check macro. Feel free to chec

Testing for a library with a function different from main() (Was: Testing for a library with $CXX (instead of $CC))

Alexandre Oliva writes: > On Apr 5, 2000, F Labrosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is it possible to test for a library using $CXX instead of $CC? > > This is an `autoconf', not `automake', question. See the `Language > Choice' node in the autoconf manual. > Seen it. Thanks. No I