On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 07:12, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> So this bug is only present if SUBDIRS is used to cause the Makefile
> to also have a recursive aspect.
Yes - which projects that include other projects will need. Or for
things like test scripts, I find throwing them in a sandbox of sorts
muc
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> > Please move the clean bug up in the priority level. Automake has a
> > non-recursive user now. :-)
>
> We've had them for ages - I've been using it for 2 years now in
> progressive increasing sizes I keep meaning to get back to my
> transformi
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 09:50, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > subdir_objects in your automake options.
> >
> > Problem is, there is a design headache that makes recursive clean fail
> > with this approach - I forget the bug #, but it's on my todo, waay down
Sir, C.E.O,
It is my humble pleasure to write this letter irrespective of the fact that you do not
know me. However, I came to know of you in my private search for a reliable and
trustworthy person that can handle a confidential transaction of this nature in
respect to our investment plans in
Hi all,
the recent confusion about what's been released and what hasn't has left
me confused. What are the latest, officially released versions of
automake and autoconf? Can I build automake 1.7.9 (if that's officially
the latest) with autconf 2.57, 2.58 or 2.59 or whatever the latest
official
I have a non-recursive make working successfully using Automake 1.7.9
and the 'subdir-objects' option. Before the 'subdir-objects' option
was supplied, it appeared that objects and dependency files were
written to the current directory using their normal base file names
(with directory part stripp
