Bob == Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bob On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
Bob == Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bob Another thing that would help reduce Makefile size is to
Bob introduce synonyms for subdirectory paths.
Better: LZW compression
Tom == Tom Tromey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
adl == Alexandre Duret-Lutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
adl Couldn't we use the (existing) .java.o: inference rule in this
adl case? Actually, is there a difference between `%.o: %.java' and
adl `.java.o:' beside portability? -- I'm not asking
Ok,
I plan to push this through a little closer to completion (some
feedback from the maintainers would be greatly appreciated !)
I've created a branch for this in arch:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/automake--nonrecursive--1.8
The arch repository is at http://people.initd.org/robertc/automake/
Paul D. Smith writes:
%% Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bf Per-subdirectory rules and definitions can be added in order to
bf significantly reduce the amount of redundant code, and to
bf re-enable the capability to usefully override parts of the default
bf Makefile.in.
Are the following tests known to fail (on debian unstable):
FAIL: ccnoco.test
FAIL: gnits2.test
FAIL: gnits3.test
FAIL: pr300-lib.test
FAIL: pr300-prog.test
FAIL: python3.test
Cheers,
Rob
--
GPG key available at: http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt.
signature.asc
Description: This is a
%% Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
lh What about an automake option then to generate Makefiles for GNU
lh make?
You might get slightly more takers for an option to allow use of pattern
rules, without specifically tying them to GNU make or relying on other
_very_ GNU make-centric
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Lars Hecking wrote:
What about an automake option then to generate Makefiles for GNU make?
How about a new binary 'automake' program that doesn't require an
external 'make' program at all? It would read the Makefile.am files
directly ...
Bob
Greetings,
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Lars Hecking wrote:
What about an automake option then to generate Makefiles for GNU make?
How about a new binary 'automake' program that doesn't require an
external 'make' program at all? It would read the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Schwab wrote:
| Here is a testcase:
|
| $ cat configure.ac
| AC_INIT([aclocal-test], [0])
| AC_PROG_CC
| AC_OUTPUT
| $ cat prog-cc.m4
| undefine([AC_PROG_CC])
| AC_DEFUN([AC_PROG_CC], [echo [AC_PROG_CC] dummy])
| $ aclocal -I .
| $ cat
Alexandre Duret-Lutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think we can't do anything about this in aclocal, apart from
documenting this new incompatibility. Since we are obviously
relying on --trace more and more, maybe we should prohibit all
macros that can affect the trace attribute.
I agree.
Is
Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You might try a CVS version of GNU m4... from the ChangeLog:
2001-10-10 Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~The trace semantics now attach the trace bit to a symbol name.
~For as long as a traceon(`foo') is active, calls to foo will
INVESTMENT
Reply only to this private email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATTENTION:
My proposal to you will be very surprising, as we have not had any
Personal contact before. However, I sincerely seek your confidence in this
Transaction, which I propose to you as a person of transparency, honesty and high
12 matches
Mail list logo
