want a university degree without going to university?

Title: GET GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMADo you want a prosperous future, increased earning powermore money and the respect of all?Call this number:  1-212-714-8290 (24 hours)  There are no requ

Re: 'make distcheck' fails due to Automake

I should mention that changing to the source directory and executing 'automake --force' seems to clear up this problem when it occurs. It seems that there must be an ordering problem to maintainer-mode activities which results in the tarballs not being removed properly. I have seen the problem th

'make distcheck' fails due to Automake

I am once again experiencing problems with Automake leaving behind the distribution files it built so 'make distcheck' fails: ERROR: files left in build directory after distclean: ./GraphicsMagick-1.2.020040419.tar.gz ./GraphicsMagick-1.2.020040419.tar.bz2 ./GraphicsMagick-1.2.020040419.zip gmake[

Purchase V.icodin Online Easily Today

Buy top painkillers without prescription Today's special: Free overnight Fedex delivery Vicodin.$2.50/dose Hydrocodone$2.17/dose Norco...$2.90/dose Stock is limited and selling fast, so hurry Buy them here

SUPPLY PRODUCT

ATTENTION: PRESIDENT/CEO. . I am a government official and I am directed to contact you, the Government of Nigeria in confidence want to embark on a supply project of your products. Details of the contract will be communicated to you when you contact me. However, I sincerely hope you will be giv

Re: AMTAR brokenness

Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've prepared this. However I'm not really proud of the name > `filenames-99'. Maybe someone can suggest some nicer name? I don't know what the rules are for Automake option spelling, but how about "filename-length-max=99"? This is because the

Re: AMTAR brokenness

>>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Paul> Many tar implementations have trouble with path names longer than 99 Paul> bytes. This includes the current GNU tar official latest non-alpha Paul> release (which is buggy in this area). It would be reasonable to add Paul> an

Re: Automake 1.8.3 doesn't build?

Eric Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Autoconf could, for example, publish a macro such as the following: > > AS_SELECT_SHELL([features], [action-if-found], [action-if-not-found]) I like this basic idea approach (though of course it would take some hacking).

Re: Automake 1.8.3 doesn't build?

Regarding use of Zsh, is it not possible to add options to the SHELL definition so that even if Zsh is the selected shell, it will properly split arguments. For example, in my Zsh manual page, I see that the -y option enables SH_WORD_SPLIT so presumably SHELL = /bin/zsh -y should emulate the Bou

Virus found in a message you sent

A virus was found in a message sent by this account. --- Scan information follows --- Result: Virus Detected Virus Name: [EMAIL PROTECTED] File Attachment: message.zip Attachment Status: infected Result: Virus Detected Virus Name: [EMAIL PROTECTED] File Attachment: message.zip/document.txt

Re: Automake 1.8.3 doesn't build?

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:01:58 +0200, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > A suggestion was to always use `SHELL = /bin/sh' in Makefiles. > I simply don't know how correct this is, because that's how it > was in the past before Chris Provenzano changed it to what it is > now. The reason for that change see