Hello,
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:16:00AM -0400, John Kodis wrote:
I'd like a program to be built when I type make, but not have it
installed when I type make install. Is there a provision for this?
[...] When this source file is compiled with
$(CC) -o $@ -DMAIN $ will build a stand-alone
Can anyone tell me why an Automake-generated Makefile
would rerun the 'configure' script when 'make' is invoked,
and whether there's a (possibly heavy-handed) way to disable
this behavior?
Thanks! Kendrick
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:46:07AM -0500, Kendrick Smith wrote:
Can anyone tell me why an Automake-generated Makefile
would rerun the 'configure' script when 'make' is invoked,
because it has regenerated 'configure' just before it and there is
possibility that the new 'configure' might
Kendrick Smith wrote:
Can anyone tell me why an Automake-generated Makefile
would rerun the 'configure' script when 'make' is invoked,
This would mean that the timestamps on the files indicate that you
have modified a source file such as modifying a Makefile.am. Because
the Makefile.am is
Hi Kendrick,
* Kendrick Smith wrote on Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:46:07PM CEST:
Can anyone tell me why an Automake-generated Makefile
would rerun the 'configure' script when 'make' is invoked,
and whether there's a (possibly heavy-handed) way to disable
this behavior?
Usually,
I am trying to find a portable way to replace this rule as given in AutoQt
[1], which the autotools warn against using:
SUFFIXES = .moc.cpp
%.moc.cpp:%.h
$(MOC) -o $@ $
The following doesn't seem to work:
SUFFIXES = .moc.cpp
.moc.cpp:.h
$(MOC) -o $@ $
The only other
I hate to say it, but it is more than ugly. As a maintainer, when forced
with the choice of leaving it as it is, which were it portable would be an
elegant solution, or replacing it with hundreds of rules that I will have to
maintain, I will leave it as it is.
If the autotools were to
Brian == Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian The following doesn't seem to work:
Brian SUFFIXES = .moc.cpp
I have never tried it but it is somewhat hard to imagine some versions
of make accepting a suffix with two '.'s in it.
Brian The only other alternative I see is to enumerate a rule
Brian == Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian If the autotools were to recognize these pattern rules, scan
Brian the source and automatically generate portable rules for me, I
Brian would be a very happy customer indeed :)
Sorry, I thought that was what we were talking about.
In terms of just
