Re: compile not copied? Why?

2005-11-14 Thread n.g.
i have Makefile.am like this, and it didn't ask for `compile' script during `configure'. bin_PROGRAMS = test test_SOURCES = c.c cc.cc both sources is empty file. On 11/14/05, Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Harald, Please consider this thread:

useful bug reports (was: [Patch] Re: compile not copied? Why?)

2005-11-14 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Harald, * Harald Dunkel wrote on Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 06:44:12PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Please consider this thread: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-10/msg00069.html How is this thread related to copying a missing script? It shows that your patch is not enough,

Re: how to make _DEPENDENCIES appear earlier in prerequisite

2005-11-14 Thread n.g.
thanks very much. it seems that if something appeared in the same place in a Makefile, they are not ordered. ex. if they are both dependencies of a target. currently, the problem is solved by using BUILT_SOURCES and/or manual rules for sources. as you mentioned. if automake accept userdefined

Re: how to make _DEPENDENCIES appear earlier in prerequisite

2005-11-14 Thread n.g.
it seems that if something appeared in the same place in a Makefile, they are not ordered. ex. if they are both dependencies of a target. currently, the problem is solved by using BUILT_SOURCES and/or manual rules for sources. as you mentioned. if automake will accept userdefined rule to be

executable extension

2005-11-14 Thread Heiko Panther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi- I would like the program I generate to have an arbitrary extension, like program.elf. It looks like the macro AC_EXEEXT was used for that, but doesn't work anymore (I use autoconf 2.59). Autoconf gives me errors when I do stuff like

Re: executable extension

2005-11-14 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Heiko, * Heiko Panther wrote on Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 10:50:58PM CET: I would like the program I generate to have an arbitrary extension, like program.elf. No problem. It looks like the macro AC_EXEEXT was used for that, but doesn't work anymore (I use autoconf 2.59). I think it was

compile multiple programs w/extension gives error

2005-11-14 Thread Heiko Panther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Trying the following gives me an error. noinst_PROGRAMS = program.elf program.bin program_elf_SOURCES = main.c program.bin: program.elf $(OBJCOPY) -O binary program.elf program.bin Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or

Re: compile multiple programs w/extension gives error

2005-11-14 Thread Harlan Stenn
Use: noinst_PROGRAMS = program.elf noinst_SCRIPTS = program.bin H -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Trying the following gives me an error. noinst_PROGRAMS = program.elf program.bin program_elf_SOURCES = main.c program.bin: program.elf $(OBJCOPY) -O

no config.sub/guess copied

2005-11-14 Thread Vincent Torri
Hello, I invoke automake -a -c and no config.sub or config.guess are copied. In my configure.ac, I use: AC_CANONICAL_TARGET AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([.]) AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE According to the doc, that should copy config.sub and config.guess in the current directory. My version of automake is 1.9.2.

Re: compile multiple programs w/extension gives error

2005-11-14 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Harlan Stenn wrote on Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 12:08:26AM CET: * Heiko Panther wrote: Trying the following gives me an error. noinst_PROGRAMS = program.elf program.bin program_elf_SOURCES = main.c program.bin: program.elf $(OBJCOPY) -O binary program.elf program.bin Use of

Re: compile multiple programs w/extension gives error

2005-11-14 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 07:37:50AM CET: noinst_PROGRAMS = program.elf program.bin program_elf_SOURCES = main.c program.bin$(EXEEXT): program.elf $(OBJCOPY) -O binary program.elf program.bin Gaah, that should've been $(OBJCOPY) -O binary