Re: Where to generate .lo files ?

2009-02-04 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Michel Briand wrote on Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 10:33:34AM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues - Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:06:52 +0100 > > > >If you're using Automake, then you're probably looking for the Automake > >option subdir-objects, which causes objects to put in directories along > >the subdir of the source fil

Re: Where to generate .lo files ?

2009-02-04 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Wednesday 2009-02-04 10:33, Michel Briand wrote: > >Furthermore I noted that .o files are twice for one source file: > >$ find . -name "main.*" -ls >49646234 -rw-r--r-- 1 michel users 266 fév 4 10:22 ./main.lo >44401878 -rw-r--r-- 1 michel users5268 fév 4 10:22

Re: Where to generate .lo files ?

2009-02-04 Thread Michel Briand
Ralf Wildenhues - Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:06:52 +0100 >Hello Michel, > >* Michel Briand wrote on Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 06:09:11PM CET: >> >> I wonder if it's possible to tell libtool to generate .lo file >> elsewhere than in source directory (where Makefile resides). > >Yes: > libtool --mode=compile