* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 12:59:53AM CEST:
Subject: [PATCH] docs, tests: synchronize examples from docs to tests
* tests/README (Writing test cases): Give suggestions on how to
keep test cases and examples in the documentation synchronized.
* doc/automake.texi:
On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 12:59:53AM CEST:
Subject: [PATCH] docs, tests: synchronize examples from docs to tests
* tests/README (Writing test cases): Give suggestions on how to
keep test cases and examples in the
Hi Stefano, and sorry for yet another delay,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:00:25PM CEST:
Posted below is a patch that I'll soon apply to the temporary branch
'GSoC/experimental/test-results-work'; it is aimed at reducing code
duplication a bit in the current testsuite,
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 03:31:22PM CEST:
Prefer a more deterministic, tabular format for the testsuite
summary, always listing the numbers of passed, failed, xfailed,
xpassed, skipped and errored tests, even when these numbers are
zero. This simplify the
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 12:59:53AM CEST:
Subject: [PATCH] docs, tests: synchronize examples from docs to tests
* tests/README (Writing test cases): Give suggestions on how to
keep test cases and examples in the documentation synchronized.
* doc/automake.texi:
On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 12:59:53AM CEST:
Subject: [PATCH] docs, tests: synchronize examples from docs to tests
* tests/README (Writing test cases): Give suggestions on how to
keep test cases and examples in the
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:32:56AM CEST:
Oops, sorry. Fixed by the attached patch. OK for maint? I'll wait
the customary 72 hours before pushing.
Thanks. OK, but please remove all the comments about tar unportability
in the tests. It's so obvious. ;-)
(and there
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 02:49:15PM CEST:
On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 03:31:22PM CEST:
Prefer a more deterministic, tabular format for the testsuite
summary, always listing the numbers of
On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Stefano, and sorry for yet another delay,
Hi Ralf, and sorry for stirring up some more noise below ;-) ...
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:00:25PM CEST:
Posted below is a patch that I'll soon apply to the temporary
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Stefano Lattarini
stefano.lattar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Robert.
OTOH, I do believe this is a real concern, to be carefully addressed and
tested for. Thanks for bringing this up.
For Both TAP and subunit the test script running needs to feed into a
On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Robert Collins wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Stefano Lattarini
stefano.lattar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Robert.
OTOH, I do believe this is a real concern, to be carefully addressed and
tested for. Thanks for bringing this up.
For Both TAP and
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:32:56AM CEST:
Oops, sorry. Fixed by the attached patch. OK for maint? I'll wait
the customary 72 hours before pushing.
Thanks. OK, but please remove all the comments about tar unportability
in the tests. It's so obvious. ;-)
(and there
Hello Robert.
On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Robert Collins wrote:
Very sorry for the slow response, been EBUSY with real-life.
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Stefano Lattarini
stefano.lattar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 22 May 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Stefano, and sorry for the
Hi,
I am facing a problem with nested packages which have mutual library and
header dependencies.
I will try to explain my problem based on some changes of the arm and hand
example, in 7.4 Nesting Packages, from GNU. Suppose that instead of having
arm and hand packages my project application has
14 matches
Mail list logo
