Re: Per-Object Flags for Autotool C++ library?

2017-11-04 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 11/4/17, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> ... >> One of our driving principles is "things just work". We don't want >> library users inconvenienced or installing extra software. They should >> be able to sit

Re: Per-Object Flags for Autotool C++ library?

2017-11-04 Thread Nick Bowler
On 11/4/17, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Nick Bowler wrote: >>> EXTRA_libcryptopp_la_DEPENDENCIES listing the objects worked for Linux >>> and OS X, but not Solaris. For Solaris I needed to drop the leading >>> `EXTRA`, and use

Re: Per-Object Flags for Autotool C++ library?

2017-11-04 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Nick Bowler wrote: > Hello, > >> EXTRA_libcryptopp_la_DEPENDENCIES listing the objects worked for Linux >> and OS X, but not Solaris. For Solaris I needed to drop the leading >> `EXTRA`, and use just `libcryptopp_la_DEPENDENCIES`. > > Is that

Re: Per-Object Flags for Autotool C++ library?

2017-11-04 Thread Nick Bowler
Hello, > EXTRA_libcryptopp_la_DEPENDENCIES listing the objects worked for Linux > and OS X, but not Solaris. For Solaris I needed to drop the leading > `EXTRA`, and use just `libcryptopp_la_DEPENDENCIES`. Is that just because you happen to be running an antique version of Automake on the Solaris

Re: Per-Object Flags for Autotool C++ library?

2017-11-04 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Nick Bowler wrote: >> On 11/3/17, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: ... >>>