AC_CONFIG_FILES problem

2000-11-07 Thread Harlan Stenn
I'm generating a site-local file during configure that I use in AC_CONFIG_FILES. The filename is in the $GUTS variable, and I create the target via: GUTS=$build_cpu-localname echo stuff $GUTS AC_CONFIG_FILES([foo:foo-top.in:$GUTS:foo-bot.in]) The problem is the generated Makefile.in has

Ultrix problem

2000-12-27 Thread Harlan Stenn
Not sure if this is an automake or an autoconf problem, and I['m putting out too many fires tonight. For a Long Time I've noticed the following output at the beginning of each "configure" run under Ultrix: configure: loading cache /dev/null checking build system type... mips-dec-ultrix4.4

Re: Ultrix problem

2000-12-29 Thread Harlan Stenn
+ eval ${SHELL} /pogo/users/stenn/src/ntp.001227/missing --run : I believe this can't be a problem in autoconf, since the `missing' script is maintained as part of automake and, indeed, the test to check whether it supports the `--run' switch relies upon `:'. Does missing work if,

Re: More an autopackage

2001-01-21 Thread Harlan Stenn
I think "layers" of config.site would be useful for parts of autopackage. There are other a number of packages out there that attempt to solve this problem in different ways, with varying degrees of success. One set of extremes is the GNU stow project v. the Modules project. Lately I'm playing

Re: More an autopackage

2001-01-22 Thread Harlan Stenn
Are there several issues here? The package maintainer has the package to worry about. Aha! Here's the crossed wire. What I was envisioning was a package tool designed such that most platforms wouldn't _need_ devoted package maintainers . We're using different language. For example,

@_am_include@ problem

2001-03-10 Thread Harlan Stenn
I did a cvs update of the latest automake and autoconf tonight. I have one generated Makefile that now contains several lines of the form: @_am_include@ $(DEPDIR)/foo.Po I'm pretty sure I did a clean build/install of these versions of automake and autoconf. I did an "autoreconf -f" in the

ultrix and 'missing'?

2001-05-09 Thread Harlan Stenn
I thought we fixed this (twice), but I'm still seeing it: configure: loading cache /dev/null checking build system type... mips-dec-ultrix4.4 checking host system type... mips-dec-ultrix4.4 checking target system type... mips-dec-ultrix4.4 checking for a BSD compatible install...

Re: ultrix and 'missing'?

2001-05-09 Thread Harlan Stenn
Ah! My configure still has: if eval $MISSING --run :; then I'll update automake again. Strange - I've tried to keep automake reasonably up-to-date. Would you prefer I used the wrapped tarball or the CVS version? Harlan -- Harlan == Harlan Stenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Harlan I

Re: ultrix and 'missing'?

2001-05-10 Thread Harlan Stenn
And is another problem that the rules that handle ansi2knr conversion create an empty foo_.c file if ansi2knr doesn't exist? Harlan

Re: ultrix and 'missing'?

2001-05-12 Thread Harlan Stenn
I'll infer my previous response was correct: ... cc -E -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../libntp -I.. -I../../include -I../../librsaref `if test -f ../../libntp/adjtime.c; then echo ../../libntp/adjtime.c; else echo adjtime.c; fi` | sed 's/^# \([0-9]\)/#line \1/' | ../util/ansi2knr adjtime_.c

Re: ultrix and 'missing'?

2001-05-17 Thread Harlan Stenn
Sure, how can I help? I bet the first thing is to get CVS automake on that box... Harlan

Re: ultrix and 'missing'?

2001-05-17 Thread Harlan Stenn
The failure is happening on a SunOS 4.1.3 box with cc and GNU make (3.76.1). The build is being done outside of the source tree: % mkdir A.`config.guess` % cd !$ % ../configure % make As I recall, the problem did not happen on a 4.1.3 box with gcc and GNU make 3.74 . I'm trying to install

Re: ultrix and 'missing'?

2001-05-18 Thread Harlan Stenn
Evil. Neither GNU make nor /bin/make catch the $(ANSI2KNR) dependency. However, if I move the lines: ANSI2KNR = ../util/ansi2knr ../util/ansi2knr: cd ../util $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) ansi2knr from their current position in the Makefile (late, after the targets that refer to them) to

Re: ultrix and 'missing'?

2001-05-19 Thread Harlan Stenn
That patch works for me. Harlan

Re: ultrix and 'missing'?

2001-05-19 Thread Harlan Stenn
A tarball generated by make dist using the patch compiled just fine on a bunch of machines. I haven't tried a maintainer version yet on the same flock of machines, but I'm pretty comfortable thinking we have this one licked. I'll make a backup copy of a working automake and check out the latest

Re: ultrix and 'missing'?

2001-05-21 Thread Harlan Stenn
Akim Could the fact that we are using a macro for the dependency be Akim responsible? Harlan, what happens if you replace the macro Akim invocation with its value? This has something to do with it. With the late fragment: ... a_md5encrypt_.c: a_md5encrypt.c $(ANSI2KNR) @echo

Re: CPP determined incorrectly

2001-05-23 Thread Harlan Stenn
This sounds familiar to me - I think I ran in to the same problem under FreeBSD on a configure.in script that only wanted to find the X directories (header and libs). I had to specify AC_PROG_CC to solve the problem. H

SUBDIRs and alternate names for Makefile

2001-05-29 Thread Harlan Stenn
I have an automake/autoconf application where the auto* generated stuff has to co-exist with a different make application, and cannot use [Mm]akefile for the names of the generated targets. I have a solution for this for the flat case, but I now have to do a SUBDIR case, too. In the main

LIBOBJS and *.Po

2001-09-23 Thread Harlan Stenn
So I've done some digging into the *.Po problem I mentioned the other day. I get the following warning message: libntp/Makefile.am:18: required file `libntp/*.c' not found and line 18 is: libntp/Makefile.am:libntp_a_LIBADD = @LIBOBJS@ The only other place that LIBOBJS is mentioned is the

.dep/*.Po ?

2001-09-19 Thread Harlan Stenn
It looks like Something is creating a file called .deps/*.Po, and there are apparently some native make implementations that Really Hate this. I've noticed it for a While, and it's still happening with automake 1.5 . Thoughts/suggestions? H

using automake to generate perl modules and Makefile.PL?

2001-09-30 Thread Harlan Stenn
Anybody have a framework for using automake (and perhaps autoconf) to generate a Makefile.PL for a perl module? I have a package that is already under auto* and somebody has a related perl module; I was thinking it might be nice if make dist would handle creating the pm's perl-mod-X.YY.tar.gz

autoreconf and overriding RECURSIVE_TARGETS

2001-10-02 Thread Harlan Stenn
I have a Makefile.am where I (think I) really want to override RECURSIVE_TARGETS. This is because the SUBDIRS have Makefiles that are generated from elsewhere and don't have all of the recursive targets (I only need a few of them and it will be Difficult/politically incorrect to add dummy

How do I stop some recursive SUBDIR tests for make distcheck?

2001-10-04 Thread Harlan Stenn
So I've been doing some digging and I don't see how to work around this problem. automake-1.5 will not let me override RECURSIVE-TARGETS. I've added empty rulesets for: dvi: dvi-am: dvi-recursive: and distcheck is *still* trying to do a make dvi in the SUBDIR. Ideas? In the fragment

transform problem with 1.5?

2001-12-31 Thread Harlan Stenn
I'm noticing a problem with automake-1.5 and the transform rule. Specifically, I'm working with CVS amanda-2 and the --with-suffix option The Makefiles generated by automake-1.5 have a transform definition that ends with a semicolon followed by a space, and the stock sed on FreeBSD-4 hates this

Mostly similar library generation

2002-04-14 Thread Harlan Stenn
First, I think the ctags/etags example in the docs are wrong, at least in the more complex example that describes de-ANSI-fication. In both the examples the input should be coming from a ._c file and the resulting file should be a ._o file. Perhaps better, a combined example that uses $U? And

Re: automake and AC_CONFIG_FILES($foo)

2002-04-18 Thread Harlan Stenn
| autoconf handles AC_CONFIG_FILES($foo) properly. But I should say it is not recommended! The documentation asks for literals whenever it is possible. Yes, and I agree with it in general. | A plain invocation of automake rightly complains that it has no idea what | it needs to look at,

installing stripped kernel modules

2002-04-19 Thread Harlan Stenn
First, I will say that I have been given a task and I don't fully understand everything that is going on with it. As I understand it, the project in question is an embedded application so production installs must be stripped to conserve space. The strip options for programs are too aggressive

INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG is apparently hardwired.

2002-04-25 Thread Harlan Stenn
install.am hardwires the INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG to -s. I think this is a lose - there are cases (like installing kernel modules for an embedded system) where one wants to do a stripped install but -s is too much. In the existing code there is apparently no way to override this. What's a good

Re: INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG is apparently hardwired.

2002-04-25 Thread Harlan Stenn
Would it be OK to say: INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG=$${INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG:-s} \ in lib/am/install.am? I'm not sure about 3 things: - if I quoted that right - if ${foo:-value} is sufficiently portable - if it's Bad to leave INSTALL_STRIP_FLAGS set in general In this last case, it might be a

*.in strangeness

2002-04-27 Thread Harlan Stenn
Some of you might remember a message I posted here a while ago where I was (implicitly) using LIBOBJS (or whatever, it was a side effect of AC_REPLCE_FUNCS) and getting messages about *.c not being found. I solved this last problem (with 1.5 and 2.53) by changing my Makefile.am's to not use that

Re: How to handle a non-compilable file.

2002-04-28 Thread Harlan Stenn
There's no point in listing the .xpm files in noinst_DATA if you're going to list them in EXTRA_DIST. Why did you do this? Probably because based on his original query I told him to put the .xpm file in noinst_DATA and I did not mention EXTRA_DIST at all. At that time, nobody had seen the

Re: installing stripped kernel modules

2002-04-28 Thread Harlan Stenn
Harlan The strip options for programs are too aggressive for kernel Harlan modules. Harlan Some Makefile.am's will install both programs and kernel Harlan modules. Harlan What are the choices for altering the strip flags? You have a few choices. You could set the INSTALL* macros at

monolithic Makefile.am

2002-05-02 Thread Harlan Stenn
So what options exist for making a single top-level monolithic Makefile.am? I can't imagine keeping this file up-to-date by hand, especially on a large project where changes must be frequently made by multiple developers. Ideas? H

Re: monolithic Makefile.am

2002-05-02 Thread Harlan Stenn
Does anybody have some examples of how this works? And is it possible to go to any spot in the tree and have a make do a monolithic (non-recursive make) build of the descendent hierarchy? H

big lie: WARNING: automake is missing...

2002-05-09 Thread Harlan Stenn
So I have two projects that exhibit the behavior where I have the auto* tools installed and when I update, say, Makefile.am and re-run a make, I get the WARNING: `automake' is missing on your system... message. This is, of course, not true. automake is there, in the path. Any ideas on what is

Parallel builds and SUBDIRS

2002-05-17 Thread Harlan Stenn
First, I'm not saying this is a good idea. I'm working on a project where Somebody decided it would be a feature to hack the automake templates to permit subdirs to be built in parallel. They implemented an additional level of locking to prevent, for example, a library that is needed by

make variables defined via include

2002-05-17 Thread Harlan Stenn
Here's what I think is happening. There's an application that uses libtool. All of the places where somebody wants to use a library it is specified via $(libfoo_la_LIBDEP), and we run a wrapper script before we run the first make that scans all of the Makefiles and builds: libfoo_la_LIBDEP =

Re: Parallel builds and SUBDIRS

2002-05-18 Thread Harlan Stenn
the subdir makefile fragments into one big happy make; then no special locking is needed. (A la recursive make considered harmful.) Boy, that's a big change, though. - Dan -Original Message- From: Harlan Stenn To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 5/17/2002 5:41 PM Subject: Parallel builds

ACLOCAL_PATH patch?

2002-06-12 Thread Harlan Stenn
The mpkg folks apply a patch to automake to allow it to support ACLOCAL_PATH. This is most useful for places that want to support multiple versions of libtool and keep the libtool installation independent of any installed versions of automake. I don't have easy access to any of my CVS automake

automake and AC_CONFIG_FILES templates

2002-06-12 Thread Harlan Stenn
An application I'm working with preprocesses the Makefile.am's to find the ones that build libraries, and creates a file that contains the path to each library: libfoo_la_LIBDEP = /path/to/libfoo.la libbar_la_LIBDEP = /path/to/libbar.la ... ALL_LIBS = \ /path/to/libfoo.la \

Re: automake and AC_CONFIG_FILES templates

2002-06-12 Thread Harlan Stenn
And I also tried: AC_CONFIG_FILES(Makefile:global-vars.mk:Makefile) H

scan_autoconf_config_files() and input files

2002-06-12 Thread Harlan Stenn
So scan_autoconf_config_files() says: ... # Handle $local:$input syntax. Note that we ignore # every input file past the first, though we keep # those around for later. my ($local, $input, rest) = split (/:/); ... and then only checks the $input

Re: scan_autoconf_config_files() and input files

2002-06-13 Thread Harlan Stenn
I'd like to discuss this problem and possible solutions with anybody who understands the guts of automake well enough to do so. H

Re: ACLOCAL_PATH patch?

2002-06-14 Thread Harlan Stenn
== Harlan Stenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Harlan The mpkg folks apply a patch to automake to allow it to support Harlan ACLOCAL_PATH. Harlan This is most useful for places that want to support Harlan multiple versions of libtool and keep the libtool Harlan installation independent of any

building native tools in a cross-compile environment

2002-06-18 Thread Harlan Stenn
I've been looking thru the docs and I I haven't found a way to do the following. I am using automake and autoconf. I am assuming: - build means the arch of the build machine - host the arch of the place where built stuff gets run autoconf detects build != host and sets up for a cross-compile.

Re: scan_autoconf_config_files() and input files

2002-07-12 Thread Harlan Stenn
I've coded but haven't tested the suggestion I got for a fix. I'll be back at work in a week and a half (or so) and will try it then. H -- Harlan == Harlan Stenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Harlan I'd like to discuss this problem and possible solutions with Harlan anybody who understands

Pathalogical behavior with more AM_CONDITIONAL()s?

2002-07-31 Thread Harlan Stenn
I have a report that indicates that as the number of AM_CONDITIONAL()s increases, the time it takes to run automake increases Significantly. This is with automake-1.5. I'm about to dive in and look at what's going on to be sure, but just in case, does anybody have any information on what might

Re: Pathalogical behavior with more AM_CONDITIONAL()s?

2002-07-31 Thread Harlan Stenn
THanks! H

Re: Pathalogical behavior with more AM_CONDITIONAL()s?

2002-07-31 Thread Harlan Stenn
Here are the results of my testing: someconditionals/: automake-1.5:249.480u 2.660s 4:42.35 89.3% 0+0k 0+0io 341pf+0w automake-1.6.3: 341.810u 2.840s 6:07.24 93.8% 0+0k 0+0io 356pf+0w moreconditionals/: automake-1.5: 1134.130u 6.730s 21:27.70 88.5% 0+0k 0+0io

Re: Pathalogical behavior with more AM_CONDITIONAL()s?

2002-08-02 Thread Harlan Stenn
I've done a bit more testing. The slowdown happens if I only modify 1 Makefile.am, and it seems to be related to using SUBDIRS inside an AM_CONDITIONAL. If I change the Makefile.am to use a non-SUBDIRS variable inside the conditional autmake zips right along. In fact, if I specify an as-yet

Re: top-level Makefile required?

2002-08-02 Thread Harlan Stenn
Bug, I'd guess. Why does automake/autoconf assume it is in charge of the directory structure? H -- On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 09:55, Harlan Stenn wrote: Is it a bug or a feature that when using automake+autoconf there Must be a top-level Makefile? I tried to write a test case for automake

Re: Pathalogical behavior with more AM_CONDITIONAL()s?

2002-08-02 Thread Harlan Stenn
: Although the code{SUBDIRS} macro can contain configure substitutions (e.g. samp{DIRS}); Automake itself does not actually examine the contents of this variable. H -- On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 09:50, Harlan Stenn wrote: I've done a bit more testing. The slowdown happens if I only modify 1

Re: top-level Makefile required?

2002-08-02 Thread Harlan Stenn
do not use Automake (such as code{gettext}). so there is clearly an intention/awareness of wanting to play nice with other software. H -- On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 10:02, Harlan Stenn wrote: Bug, I'd guess. Why does automake/autoconf assume it is in charge of the directory structure? I'll

Re: top-level Makefile required?

2002-08-03 Thread Harlan Stenn
I typed it correctly in configure.ac and incorrectly in my email. H -- On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 07:55:43PM -0400, Harlan Stenn wrote: Is it a bug or a feature that when using automake+autoconf there Must be a top-level Makefile? I tried to write a test case for automake (debugging

object `foo.$(OBJEXT)' created both with libtool and without

2002-08-19 Thread Harlan Stenn
Automake-1.6.3. So I have a Makefile.am that build both PROGRAMS and LTLIBRARIES. One of the .c modules is used by both a program and a library. I get the warning: automake: foo/Makefile:NN: object `foo.$(OBJEXT)' created both with libtool and without and I'm assuming it's because this

libfoo.la is already going to be installed in `lib'

2002-08-19 Thread Harlan Stenn
I hope I didn't ask about this one already. I have a Makefile.am that uses conditionals: foo/Makefile.am: if COND1 libfoo = libfoo.la endif if COND2 libfoo = libfoo.la endif ... lib_LTLIBRARIES = $(libfoo) and when I run automake-1.6.3 on it I get: automake: foo/Makefile.am:

CVS automake v. nearly-1.6.4

2002-09-19 Thread Harlan Stenn
Is there anything in the CVS repo that will not be part of the next automake release? IE, what do I want to use if I want to get the release candidate? H

CFLAGS is a user variable...

2002-09-20 Thread Harlan Stenn
I'm using autoconf-2.54 and CVS automake (current). I'm getting a bunch of messages of the form: configure.in:51: `CFLAGS' is a user variable, you should not override it; configure.in:51: use `AM_CFLAGS' instead. which is irritating but probably cool. What is not cool is that line 51 of

libfoo.la is already going to be installed in lib.

2002-09-21 Thread Harlan Stenn
This appears to be aproblem with libtool+automake; if I use a static library (no libtool) I don't see this problem. Is there a workaround/bugfix? This problem means that autoreconf bails with an error... (Yes, I've tried a couple of other choices, like using a variable in the conditionals and

CVS automake, -Wwarnings, and AM_PROG_LIBTOOL

2002-09-21 Thread Harlan Stenn
If I enable warnings with CVS automake and run autoreconf, AM_PROG_LIBTOOL generates a warning: configure.in:64: warning: The macro `AC_FD_CC' is obsolete. You should run autoupdate. Line 64 is AM_PROG_LIBTOOL. Or am I missing something? H

Should ylwap get installed by autoreconf -i?

2002-09-21 Thread Harlan Stenn
I'm not sure if this is a bug or a feature. The documentation says: The `ylwrap' program is distributed with Automake. It should appear in the directory specified by `AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR' (*note Finding `configure' Input: (autoconf)Input.), or the current directory if that macro is not used

Re: Should ylwap get installed by autoreconf -i?

2002-09-24 Thread Harlan Stenn
Harlan I'm asking because we have discovered that (since Harlan automake/1.5, at least) ylwrap is not being installed by Harlan either automake --add-missing or autoreconf --install. Does this still happen with 1.6 and the current 1.7 prerelease? I remember some fixes in this area between

grub-0.92 and CVS automake...

2002-09-25 Thread Harlan Stenn
Sorry if this is lame, but it's been a Long Day and I'm wasted. It looks like grub-0.92 has Difficulty with ac-2.54 and am-CVS. The problem is that grub likes the old style of AS rules, and current automake/autoconf Really Want grub to use AM_PROG_AS. Making this change means asm.S no longer

subdir-objects and 1.7

2002-09-27 Thread Harlan Stenn
I'm noticing a change from 1.5 to 1.7 regarding subdir-objects. I had to upgrade the automake/autoconf usage of ucd-snmp. Not fun. I had things working with am-1.5. I'm having dependency issues with am-1.7. In particular, agent/Makefile.am uses configure to build a list of files:

Re: FYI: same library installed several times in same directory (PR/350)

2002-10-21 Thread Harlan Stenn
Harlan Just to ask, what is the problem if the same library is Harlan installed in two different places? Automake produces only one rule to link the library, and therefore doesn't know how to set `-rpath' correctly. See PR/285. So what is the problem with: if COND1 lib_LTLIBRARIES =

Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects

2002-10-24 Thread Harlan Stenn
Re: glob v. list Why not provide both mechanisms, and let people use what they want? Personally, I've been bitten far more often with globs and would tend to explicitly list files. But that's my policy decision and this is really a mechanism question. H

Extending VPATH

2003-01-07 Thread Harlan Stenn
I find that automake-1.7* (at least) complains about lines like: if COND_FOO VPATH=$(srcdir):$(srcdir)/../foo endif in Makefile.am's (VPATH was already defined in condition TRUE, which implies COND_FOO). Bug or feature? H

Re: Patch to aclocal

2003-03-05 Thread Harlan Stenn
I submitted a patch to handle this a while ago. Don't know what happened to it. H

Re: $srcdir

2003-03-05 Thread Harlan Stenn
But if I echo either $top_srcdir or $top_builddir, in the file tests/foo.test, they are both null, so I can't seem to find a way of referring to any files. AC_OUTPUT your test scripts using foo.in - foo rules, and include lines like: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ in them. Either that, or AC_OUTPUT a

distribution signatures

2003-07-16 Thread Harlan Stenn
I'm trying to find a way to have automake generate Makefiles that will automatically generate digital signatures for distributions, and trying to figure out a good way to handle it. I think the easy one will be sum; other ones could include md5, with more available if openssl, gnupg, or pgp is

Re: distribution signatures

2003-07-16 Thread Harlan Stenn
cases. I think... H -- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 04:45:09AM -0400, Harlan Stenn wrote: I'm trying to find a way to have automake generate Makefiles

Re: 1.7.6, DIST_SUBDIRS, and distcheck

2003-08-14 Thread Harlan Stenn
In this case, the subdir is another auto* package. I *could* solve this by passing an argument to distcheck's configure , but I didn't see how to do that, either. Is there a way to pass configure options to distcheck's configure run? H -- Hi, Harlan Stenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I

1.7.6, DIST_SUBDIRS, and distcheck

2003-08-14 Thread Harlan Stenn
I have a subroutine that is only conditionally built. I have listed this subroutine in DIST_SUBDIRS, as that's where I gather the list of subdirs that must be in a distribution but might not be built are specified. With 1.7.6, distcheck now fails as it tries to cd to this directory inside the

Re: 1.7.6, DIST_SUBDIRS, and distcheck

2003-08-16 Thread Harlan Stenn
Harlan Is there a way to pass configure options to distcheck's Harlan configure run? See DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS. Thanks, and that doesn't work completely either. (This is for ntp-dev, in case anybody is curious.) Here's the drill. ntp now includes an optional (subdir) package, sntp.

automake-1.7.7 and AM_CFLAGS/CFLAGS

2003-10-09 Thread Harlan Stenn
I have an automake/autoconf package that builds normal software and also kernel modules. configure builds a default set of CFLAGS that gets used to build general software. The problem is that the Makefile.am for any kernel code needs to use different CFLAGS, and when automake sees this we get

Re: automake-1.7.7 and AM_CFLAGS/CFLAGS

2003-10-09 Thread Harlan Stenn
Thanks, if it comes down to it I'll put AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS=-Wno-gnu in the affected Makefile.am's. I'm trying hard to keep the warnings, as I want the developers to write cleaner code... H

Aborting automake?

2003-11-07 Thread Harlan Stenn
I have a situation where I want every Makefile.am to 'include' one of several files. If none of these files are 'include'd I want the automake run to abort. I know how to cause the abort at runtime, but I'd rather catch this problem while automake is running. Is there a way to do this? H

defining xxx_PROGRAMS conditionally?

2003-11-07 Thread Harlan Stenn
I know this has been discussed before, and I don't remember seeing a good solution. Perhaps this has changed with automake-1.7.7... I have a situation where I am using automake conditionals to control the installation directory of _PROGRAMS. In certain configurations I want them to be

Re: defining xxx_PROGRAMS conditionally?

2003-11-11 Thread Harlan Stenn
Did you mean autoconf 2.58? I don't see 2.59 anywhere... And where is CVS automake these days? Is it still on sourceware.cygnus.com? H -- Harlan == Harlan Stenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Harlan I know this has been discussed before, and I don't Harlan remember seeing a good solution

linewrap problem?

2003-11-20 Thread Harlan Stenn
ntp's util/Makefile.am has a line that looked something like: bin_PROGRAMS = @A@ @B@ @C@ and was almost 80 characters long. automake-1.7.7 (and 1.7.8, apparently) have a problem in that they wrap the line (adding a \ continuation). The problem is that if the conditional programs are not being

Rebuilding if Makefile changes

2003-11-29 Thread Harlan Stenn
Is there an easy way (using automake) to have all of the built targets depend on the Makefile, so whenever the Makefile changes everything will get rebuilt? H

automake-1.8 and texinfo

2003-12-13 Thread Harlan Stenn
The instructions say that automake 1.8 can be built with texinfo-4.0 or later. In my experience 4.0 doesn't do it, but 4.2 is OK.o H

1.8 and mkdir_p

2004-01-02 Thread Harlan Stenn
This change: - Makefiles will prefer `mkdir -p' over mkinstalldirs if it is available. This selection is achieved through the Makefile variable $(mkdir_p) that is set by AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE to either `mkdir -m 0755 -p --', `$(mkinstalldirs) -m 0755', or `$(install_sh) -m 0755

Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p

2004-01-06 Thread Harlan Stenn
Howdy Alexandre, Happy new year. Thanks, and same to you. Harlan == Harlan Stenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Harlan This change: Harlan - Makefiles will prefer `mkdir -p' over mkinstalldirs if it is Harlan available. This selection is achieved through the Makefile Harlan variable

bug 285/distinguished install targets for ltlibraries

2004-01-07 Thread Harlan Stenn
I'm looking for a fast fix to this problem, as it is the current sticking point on a bunch of other changes I need to implement for a project. I don't know if I'll have the time to implement the potential fixes described in the bug report at this time, so I'm wondering if there may be another way

Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p

2004-01-13 Thread Harlan Stenn
[1] There are people who think a config.guess output that says: i686-pc-linux-gnu is normal, while some of us feel that is a particularly useless value a= nd would prefer to see something like: i686-pc-redhat7.3 instead, just like the original documentation spec'd out.

Re: config.guess and freedom (was: 1.8 and mkdir_p)

2004-01-13 Thread Harlan Stenn
Harlan Stenn wrote (meaning Linux distribution when he writes OS): help tool maintainers make choices about how things that are hard to find out otherwise (like OS-based choices). ... everybody who wants to make OS-level decisions has to code their own tests to figure out the OS name

Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p

2004-01-13 Thread Harlan Stenn
slows progress toward the goal we both seem to have in common. And N people writing N different autoconf macros does not do much to advance the art. H -- Harlan Stenn wrote: The differences between ALL of the various linux-gnu implementations are so slight that they are far more suited

Re: config.guess and freedom (was: 1.8 and mkdir_p)

2004-01-13 Thread Harlan Stenn
If there was a version number in the Vendor field I'd be lots happier. In the RH distros I've seen (and the config.guess output on those boxes) I have still only seen pc for the Vendor field. H -- On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 13:43, Bruno Haible wrote: Harlan Stenn wrote: If the releases

Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p

2004-01-13 Thread Harlan Stenn
I think you are missing my point. =20 The information I am talking about is used for *runtime* decisions - very likely in a script that is in a shared directory used by many different architectures. Oh, well, config.guess isn't designed for that -- it's for compile time decisions.

Re: config.guess and freedom (was: 1.8 and mkdir_p)

2004-01-13 Thread Harlan Stenn
to go in my experience. H -- Harlan Stenn wrote: If the releases are all that similar, why not use: i686-GnuLinux-* as your test, and provide the popular distributions in the 3rd field? This is a little more reasonable, since it allows to check for Linux with a single test

Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p

2004-01-14 Thread Harlan Stenn
It is way to late to even think about changing things now. It's never too late to improve software. The amount of software that will be created from here on can be reasonably expected to be MUCH greater than what has been written so far. The change to, for example: i686-DistroRev-linux-gnu

Re: VPATH?

2004-01-29 Thread Harlan Stenn
Thanks! I'll do what I can. One problem is that this works for me in 108 other Makefile.am's, and every once in a while one of them stops working and I have to say where each source file lives. It is strange... H -- Sorry for the delay. Harlan == Harlan Stenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

Re: Conditional Library Compilation

2004-02-03 Thread Harlan Stenn
Be aware that += does not work with automake conditionals in several/many cases until you get to at least 1.6. H

automake 1.8 performance problems

2004-03-24 Thread Harlan Stenn
We have a tree with over 1200 Makefile.am's. Under automake-1.5 these files were processed in about 15 minutes on a reasonably zippy machine. Under 1.8 this takes over an hour and a half. I first mentioned this in: http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2004-02/msg00058.html which

Re: automake 1.8 performance problems

2004-03-30 Thread Harlan Stenn
Alexandre, I am running different versions of automake against the code in question and am getting Interesting results - sometimes automake-1.8.3 runs in 9-12 minutes, and sometimes it takes about an hour. I'm trying to find a way to reliably duplicate each case. I might have more results and

Re: automake 1.8 performance problems

2004-03-31 Thread Harlan Stenn
OK, I think I have something. If AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR is populated, automake runs in 9-15 minutes of wall-clock time. If it is not populated (except for ltmain.sh) then it takes 45 minutes to run. The items that end up in AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR are: compile* config.sub* install-sh* missing*

.Plo corruption

2004-04-23 Thread Harlan Stenn
Folks, I'm following up on the problem Asim Suter mentioned last October. We are seeing problems where .Plo files get corrupted. This has been happening with automake-1.5 thru 1.8.3, and autoconf-2.53 thru 2.59. We have noticed this problem on RedHat 7.3 (probably earlier as well). I think we

Re: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([-Werror]) problem

2004-05-13 Thread Harlan Stenn
OK and thanks on all counts! H -- Harlan == Harlan Stenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Harlan Just in case this was missed... Thanks. (Actually it's easier for me if you send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Harlan So I'm using AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([-Werror]) and I notice

AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([-Werror]) problem

2004-05-06 Thread Harlan Stenn
Just in case this was missed... So I'm using AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([-Werror]) and I notice this: Edit Makefile.am bogusly gmake cd /sourceplace /bin/sh /sourceplace/config/missing --run automake-1.8 --foreign libcdb/Makefile:global-vars.mk:libcdb/Makefile.in libcdb/Makefile.am:27: AM_CFLAGS

  1   2   3   >