and see what happens in the final
Makefile, but I still do prefer to know whether such inclusion of *CLEANFILES
is formal and can be expected from Automake.
Thanks in advance,
fr33domlover
PGP key ID: 937A67EF
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
I'm writing a Makefile.am with a custom piece for building, distributing and
installing Doxygen-generated documentation. All the generated files are used as
values for the special-scheme variables, e.g. 'dist_reference_DATA =
index.html'.
Installation targets are automatically generated,
Hello automakers!
I'm using autoconf 2.69 and automake 1.11.6 (Debian 7 stable). Recently I tried
defining the source code folder name using a variable and strange things happen.
I'm not sure whether this is a bug or my mistake. Here's the revelant part
from Makefile.am, before the change, which
On 2014-08-12
Nick Bowler nbow...@elliptictech.com wrote:
Yes, but I think you have clean/distclean backwards. There are four
clean targets:
mostlyclean
clean
distclean
maintainer-clean
Each target in the list performs all the actions of the targets
above it in addition to
On 2014-08-12
fr33domlover fr33domlo...@riseup.net wrote:
Hello,
I'm writing a Makefile.am with a custom piece for building, distributing and
installing Doxygen-generated documentation. All the generated files are used
as values for the special-scheme variables, e.g. 'dist_reference_DATA
, and this issue
seems to be the only thing preventing that.
Thanks!
fr33domlover
PGP key ID: 937A67EF
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
for this in automake?
If not, I'll take a look at the implementation of distcheck and see if anything
can be done about it (maybe some kind of variable(s) which means files used
for inst/dist/both but are themselves nodist_noinst).
fr33domlover
PGP key ID: 937A67EF
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On 2014-10-20
Nick Bowler nbow...@elliptictech.com wrote:
Not exactly. Distcheck first creates a distribution tarball (i.e.,
make dist), THEN it unpacks the tarball into a temporary srcdir and
tests that. In other words, distcheck is directly testing the 'user
experience' when they unpack
Hello,
I'm a bit confused about all the expressive features and ways to use makefile
variables, so just to be sure -
http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Substitution-Refs.html
Are these uses of variables portable, or should a portable Makefile.am use only
the plain $(var) form
On 2014-10-27
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/27/2014 11:11 AM, Nick Bowler wrote:
On 2014-10-26 22:15 +0200, fr33domlover wrote:
I'm a bit confused about all the expressive features and ways to use
makefile variables, so just to be sure -
http://www.gnu.org/software/make
On 2014-11-11
Simon Richter simon.rich...@hogyros.de wrote:
Hi,
On 11.11.2014 18:50, fr33domlover wrote:
When I ran `make distcheck`, it failed because the HTML files don't get
cleaned by `make distclean`. That makes sense, but specifically for my
package this is not an error
On 2014-11-11
Simon Richter simon.rich...@hogyros.de wrote:
Hi,
On 11.11.2014 21:07, fr33domlover wrote:
When the files are distributed, the distcheck should recognize that
these belong in the source package, and not show an error.
Hmmm I think I didn't make myself clear. So just
On 2014-11-12
Nick Bowler nbow...@elliptictech.com wrote:
Hello,
On 2014-11-11 22:07 +0200, fr33domlover wrote:
On 2014-11-11
Simon Richter simon.rich...@hogyros.de wrote:
On 11.11.2014 18:50, fr33domlover wrote:
When I ran `make distcheck`, it failed because the HTML files
On 2014-11-12
fr33domlover fr33domlo...@riseup.net wrote:
Here's part of my code:
all-local: ref
ref: ref-html
ref-html: ref-full-html ref-api-html
ref-full: ref-full-html
ref-api: ref-api-html
ref-full-html: $(reference_full_devhelp_chosen
14 matches
Mail list logo
