On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 13:24:11 -0600 (CST), Bob Friesenhahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It would be useful if Automake supported a set of options (e.g.
LDFLAGS) which are applied only when building libraries or when
building programs. It is excessively painful to have to add
per-target _LDFLAGS
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:49:04AM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
It would be great to have `LT_LDFLAGS = -module', rather than 15 lines of
`foo_LDFLAGS = -module' in a future m4 Makefile.am :-)
Regarding M4: last time I checked you had a directory dedicated to
modules. Why don't you simply
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
| On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:49:04AM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
|
|It would be great to have `LT_LDFLAGS = -module', rather than 15 lines of
|`foo_LDFLAGS = -module' in a future m4 Makefile.am :-)
|
|
| Regarding M4: last
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Actually, now that you point it out, I would hit that problem myself, since m4
has normal _LTLIBRARIES, noinst_LTLIBRARIES and modules. I would be happy if
I could do this:
~AM_LDFLAGS = everything gets these
~noinst_LTLIBRARIES_LDFLAGS =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
| Automake should support
|
| o inheritance of standard configure flags
LDFLAGS
| o flags common across all targets
AM_LDFLAGS
| o additional flags common to a grouping of targets
dir_PRIMARY_LDFLAGS
| o additional
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I would be happy if I could do this:
I tend to disagree with you on this point. I will agree if the system
has three levels plus a way to provide overrides..
Automake should support
o inheritance of standard
It would be useful if Automake supported a set of options (e.g.
LDFLAGS) which are applied only when building libraries or when
building programs. It is excessively painful to have to add
per-target _LDFLAGS options. Perhaps there should be both 'LT' and
non-'LT' macro versions.
Certainly this
