Hi Stepan,
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 04:33:48PM CET:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 06:45:51PM +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
[...] the macros to test for -c/-o compatibility in automake. [...]
this is an interesting question: is the test for -c -o really needed
for a Fortran or
On 2006 Jan 16 , at 15.33, Stepan Kasal wrote:
Would it be bad
if projects using Automake required GNU Compiler for Fortran?
Extremely. Folk doing serious Fortran development routinely
experiment with multiple compilers, and would not appreciated being
limited in any way here.
As
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 06:45:51PM +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
[...] the macros to test for -c/-o compatibility in automake. [...]
this is an interesting question: is the test for -c -o really needed
for a Fortran or F77 compiler?
Currently, _Autoconf_ contains macros to test -c -o for
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 04:33:48PM +0100, Stepan Kasal wrote:
Currently, _Autoconf_ contains macros to test -c -o for C, Fortran,
and Fortran77 languages. _Automake_ contains a wrapper for the C macro,
but not for the latter two ones.
But the latter two macros have the following comment
Hi Davyd,
* Davyd Madeley wrote on Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 07:38:36AM CET:
I see that it is not possible to use Fortran with subdir-objects. What
would be required to implement something like this?
This: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.automake.general/6527
plus changes
Ralf,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 11:02:23AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Davyd Madeley wrote on Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 07:38:36AM CET:
I see that it is not possible to use Fortran with subdir-objects. What
would be required to implement something like this?
This: http://article.gmane.org
I see that it is not possible to use Fortran with subdir-objects. What would be
required to implement something like this?
--d
--
Davyd MadeleySoftware Engineer
Fugro Seismic Imaging, Perth Australia
