Re: PATCH RFA: Add Go support

2010-11-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Ian, let's move this part of the discussion to the automake@ list. And sorry for delays, I cannot help that ATM. * Ian Lance Taylor wrote on Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 09:58:49PM CEST: Ralf Wildenhues writes: * Ian Lance Taylor wrote on Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 07:31:04PM CEST: Ralf Wildenhues

Re: PATCH RFA: Add Go support

2010-11-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ dropping libtool@ ] * Ian Lance Taylor wrote on Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:48:03PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de writes: We need a bit of new notation for this, and we need to teach automake about languages that shouldn't have renamed objects even in the presence of

Re: PATCH RFA: Add Go support

2010-11-01 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de writes: OK. So IIUC one example dependency graph would be something like this: ( sin.go cos.go exp.go ) - math.OBJEXT - libfem.so ( grid.go solver.go )- sub/pdesolve.OBJEXT ---^ where the sets of .go files are distinct, the sets of object

Re: PATCH RFA: Add Go support

2010-11-01 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de writes: [ dropping libtool@ ] * Ian Lance Taylor wrote on Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:48:03PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de writes: We need a bit of new notation for this, and we need to teach automake about languages that shouldn't have