Ralf == Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Ralf A semi-classic example of such a situation is this one:
[...]
Ralf AS_IF([test $enable_cxx = yes],
Ralf [AC_PROG_CXX])
[...]
Ralf = Not even automake and autoconf are to treat this situation properly.
No. But if someone
Hi Bruce,
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 08:35:27AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
if [some-shell-script-test]
then
...
AM_CONDITIONAL([XXX], [true])
else
...
AM_CONDITIONAL([XXX], [false])
fi
reading the docs some more, they explicitly state to not do this.
I re-read the node
On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 11:09 +0100, Stepan Kasal wrote:
Hi Bruce,
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 08:35:27AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
if [some-shell-script-test]
then
...
AM_CONDITIONAL([XXX], [true])
else
...
AM_CONDITIONAL([XXX], [false])
fi
reading the docs some
Hi
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 03:21:44PM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
[`some-shell-script-test`
if test $? -eq 0
then]
AM_CONDITIONAL([XXX], [true])
[else]
AM_CONDITIONAL([XXX],[false])
[fi]
one usually relies that `else', `fi', etc. are not m4 macros.
So it's usually enough to write
Hi Stepan,
On Monday 10 January 2005 06:00 am, Stepan Kasal wrote:
So it's usually enough to write
Well, I'd use
if [some-shell-script-test]
then
...
AM_CONDITIONAL([XXX], [true])
else
...
AM_CONDITIONAL([XXX], [false])
fi
This is more-or-less exactly what is going on,
Bruce == Bruce Korb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce The problem is is that XXX *DOES* actually appear in an AM_CONDITIONAL.
But these macros are not evaluated because of your quoting, so
effectively XXX is not defined at all.
[...]
Bruce [`some-shell-script-test`
Bruce if test $? -eq 0
On Saturday 08 January 2005 01:53 pm, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
Bruce == Bruce Korb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce The problem is is that XXX *DOES* actually appear in an
AM_CONDITIONAL.
But these macros are not evaluated because of your quoting, so
effectively XXX is not defined at
