Hi Bob,
* Bob Proulx wrote on Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 05:18:21AM CET:
Looks to me like if your generated code had proper dependencies you
would not need the 'moreclean' step. Is that observation correct?
If no, what am I missing? If yes, then let's see why you have not
(or can not?)
Perrog wrote:
2007/2/28, Bob Proulx [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would really like a clean target that would remove generated source
files such as generated .c and .h files. In the case of yacc and lex
I would like to distribute the generated files so as not to require
the use of yacc and lex to
Hello Bob,
quick reply upon a glance:
* Bob Proulx wrote on Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 05:37:56PM CET:
[...]
-- less clean -- more clean --
MOSTLYCLEANFILES
CLEANFILES
MORECLEANFILES
DISTCLEANFILES
MAINTAINERCLEANFILES
With a use
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Bob Proulx wrote on Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 05:37:56PM CET:
With a use model more like this somewhat stylized example.
[...]
...modify code generator...
make moreclean
make
Looks to me like if your generated code had proper dependencies you
would not need
I would really like a clean target that would remove generated source
files such as generated .c and .h files. In the case of yacc and lex
I would like to distribute the generated files so as not to require
the use of yacc and lex to compile the distribution. This rules out
DISTCLEANFILES or
