choosing the default for silent-rules

2009-04-19 Thread Jim Meyering
What if a package maintainer wants to enable automake's silent-rules option by default? Currently, even when I use AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([silent-rules]) it's disabled, and to get the behavior I want, I have to run ./configure --enable-silent-rules or make V=0. Is there a recommended way to make the

Re: choosing the default for silent-rules

2009-04-19 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Jim, * Jim Meyering wrote on Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 10:53:40AM CEST: What if a package maintainer wants to enable automake's silent-rules option by default? Then you should argue for this; see the arguments against it here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2009-04/msg00019.html

Re: choosing the default for silent-rules

2009-04-19 Thread Jim Meyering
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Jim Meyering wrote on Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 10:53:40AM CEST: What if a package maintainer wants to enable automake's silent-rules option by default? Then you should argue for this; see the arguments against it here: ... Hi Ralf, I think backwards compatibility is

Re: choosing the default for silent-rules

2009-04-19 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Jim Meyering wrote on Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 01:34:50PM CEST: Switching to silent-rules feels like progress, so I want it to be enabled by default, at least for packages I maintain. Of course, that's my judgment, and if enough people say that my enabling silent-rules broke their XYZ, I can

Re: choosing the default for silent-rules

2009-04-19 Thread Jim Meyering
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Jim Meyering wrote on Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 01:34:50PM CEST: Switching to silent-rules feels like progress, so I want it to be enabled by default, at least for packages I maintain. Of course, that's my judgment, and if enough people say that my enabling silent-rules