Greetings,
Following up on my previous message.
On Friday, August 29, 2003, at 10:56 PM, Norman Gray wrote:
The problem is, of course, the `missing' script, and what happens when
a checked-out generated file apparently needs to be rebuilt on a
developer's machine.
[...]
There seems to be
Greetings,
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 23:39:09 +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
We as a project have decided to go the route of checking
autotool-generated files into our CVS repository, and as a result are
discovering the full subtleties of the consequences of that, in
I suffered similar problems until I
machine. The `missing --run' mechanism works fine when the
locally-installed autoconf is sufficiently up-to-date to work, and also
when there is _no_ autoconf installed, however it can fail if there
_is_ a local autoconf, but it is too old to process the
configure.{in,ac} file correctly.
One
On Friday 29 August 2003 10:56 pm, Norman Gray wrote:
Greetings,
We as a project have decided to go the route of checking
autotool-generated files into our CVS repository, and as a result are
discovering the full subtleties of the consequences of that, in
particular the issues concerning
