Re: warning: TEST_LDFLAGS' is defined but no program or library has 'TEST' as canonical name

2017-11-20 Thread Thomas Martitz
Am 20.11.2017 um 19:01 schrieb Nick Bowler: Hi, If you were to later add a program called TEST, then the results could be surprising. But you can certainly ignore the warning if you'd like. I understand that, however we're extremely unlikely to build programs named in all-upper case.

Re: warning: TEST_LDFLAGS' is defined but no program or library has 'TEST' as canonical name

2017-11-20 Thread Nick Bowler
Hi, On 2017-11-20, Thomas Martitz wrote: > here's some quite annoying warning. I'm trying to define a variable > TEST_LDFLAGS that multiple programs use. There is no program named TEST. > The same works fine with TEST_CFLAGS (i.e. no warning is displayed). > > Here's the

warning: TEST_LDFLAGS' is defined but no program or library has 'TEST' as canonical name

2017-11-20 Thread Thomas Martitz
Hello, here's some quite annoying warning. I'm trying to define a variable TEST_LDFLAGS that multiple programs use. There is no program named TEST. The same works fine with TEST_CFLAGS (i.e. no warning is displayed). Here's the warning: Makefile.am:4: warning: variable 'TEST_LDFLAGS' is