Akim == Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Akim Now if that causes real problems, not just esthetics, then of
Akim course it ought to be fixed.
Sometimes these esthetic considerations are important -- to me
anyway. Also, in this case there is a small performance penalty for
the existing
Phil Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Been playing with 1.5 and have been pretty pleased with the support for
source files in subdirectories. I have noticed however something which
strikes me as odd:
% make
make all-am
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/pme/foo'
That code is there support non-srcdir builds in the face of 'make's
with broken VPATH implementations.
Ah, okay. Having never worked with such a 'make' this caught me off guard.
Thanks!
Phil
Hari == Raja R Harinath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hari That code is there support non-srcdir builds in the face of
Hari 'make's with broken VPATH implementations. If you look at the
Hari Makefile, you'll see that it is checking to see whether 'make'
Hari said that the source file was in
Tom == Tom Tromey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Tom Even finding a way to reject non-srcdir builds for non-GNU make won't
Tom help here.
At least it would help to clean up the _implicit_ rules,
wouldn't it?
Some people seems to not like this at all. The following
excerpt comes from
Hi,
Tom Tromey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hari == Raja R Harinath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hari That code is there support non-srcdir builds in the face of
Hari 'make's with broken VPATH implementations. If you look at the
Hari Makefile, you'll see that it is checking to see whether