Re: writability of directories in distributions

2009-11-29 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, Jim Meyering wrote: The other issue, as I recall, has to do with whether or not 'root' is doing the unpacking. Remember that 'root' is going away on many systems which are now using roles' (or temporary powers) instead. At whatever pace, this won't be widespread enough to

Re: writability of directories in distributions

2009-11-29 Thread Jim Meyering
Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Sat, 28 Nov 2009, Harlan Stenn wrote: >> I just saw a patch go by about changing the perms on directories in >> distribution tarballs. >> >> I'm a fan of 775 myself (ok, I really prefer 2775). >> >> But I can see that some would prefer 777, and others would prefer 755. >

Re: writability of directories in distributions

2009-11-29 Thread Jim Meyering
Harlan Stenn wrote: > I just saw a patch go by about changing the perms on directories in > distribution tarballs. > > I'm a fan of 775 myself (ok, I really prefer 2775). > > But I can see that some would prefer 777, and others would prefer 755. > > The other issue, as I recall, has to do with whet

Re: writability of directories in distributions

2009-11-29 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009, Harlan Stenn wrote: I just saw a patch go by about changing the perms on directories in distribution tarballs. I'm a fan of 775 myself (ok, I really prefer 2775). But I can see that some would prefer 777, and others would prefer 755. The other issue, as I recall, has to d

writability of directories in distributions

2009-11-28 Thread Harlan Stenn
I just saw a patch go by about changing the perms on directories in distribution tarballs. I'm a fan of 775 myself (ok, I really prefer 2775). But I can see that some would prefer 777, and others would prefer 755. The other issue, as I recall, has to do with whether or not 'root' is doing the un