Hi Akim.
On 02/02/2013 08:24 AM, Akim Demaille wrote:
Le 1 févr. 2013 à 10:35, Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com a
écrit :
So, is anyone using or playing with Automake-NG, or at least
contemplating the idea to do so in the short term? Or should
we just let the project die?
On 02/01/2013 08:27 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
[SNIP]
Which makes me think that forcing users to bootstrap the project from a
Git branch hidden in Automake's repository in order to use it might be
hampering their willingness to give it a try.
Hi Peter, Eric, thanks for the feedback and the support.
On 02/02/2013 01:51 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
On 2013-02-02 01:15, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/01/2013 05:00 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
Supporting INCLUDES in automake-NG costs nearly nothing.
This, however, is a statement I'm not willing to
On 02/02/2013 01:40 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
I subscribe to all the good opinions about NG that have been
made here. I would definitely use it once there is a release
(I have already been criticized several times for having used
then-CVS versions of the Autotools in Bison, and I don't
On Sat, 2 Feb 2013, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Git surely makes it easy to promote a branch to a new top-level repository.
Having it available by default in a repository would be easier to grasp
for git-challenged people like me.
Other people have spoken against the need of such a split though.
