Hello Alfred,
* Alfred M. Szmidt wrote on Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 06:59:17PM CEST:
> Here is a trivial patch to fix a nano-typo, scr vs. src.
Thanks. I've applied this. I added the `tiny change' because I don't
know if PACKAGING as an entry in the copyright list has anything to do
with the Autotoo
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:03:33PM CEST:
> >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> RW> I'm pretty sure users will be confused about this error message --
> RW> I even was. I think the one below would be a bit better.
> I'm wary of suggesting to
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:33:12PM CEST:
> >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> RW> * automake.in: For preprocessed assembler, add `$(DEFS)
> RW> $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES)' to the compile rule.
> RW> * doc/automake.texi (Assembly Support):
* Andreas Schwab wrote on Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 03:01:01PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > +* Languages changes:
> > +
> > + - subdir-object mode works now with Assembler. Assembler assumes
> > +that the compiler understands `-c -o'.
>
> s/Assembler. Assembler/
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:37:55PM CEST:
> >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> RW> Updated patches (added test for no-dependencies), plus an additional
> RW> typo in the manual. OK?
>
> Yes please.
Done, thanks.
> RW> * automake.in (%_mac
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:22:47PM CEST:
> >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> RW> OK to apply?
>
> Sure. Thanks.
Done, thanks.
> RW> * automake.in (handle_LIBOBJS_or_ALLOCA): If we are in the
> RW> LIBOBJDIR, then we should not add a DEPDI
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:54:46PM CEST:
> >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> RW> - For aesthetics, it is desirable to have the source file name appear at
> RW> the end of the command lines at compile time
> RW> (see the comment in automake/li
* Bruno Haible wrote on Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 01:50:12PM CEST:
>
> The only thing I don't understand is a comment in the test:
> "po/ is required, but intl/ isn't." Should better read
> "po/ and intl/ are required.". No?
Fixed, thanks.
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:05:02
Hello Alexandre,
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:58:39PM CEST:
>
> Given that people are waiting for 1.10, I'd like to postpone all
> these changes to after the release, and aim for 1.11 shortly afterward.
> (Maybe skipping 1.10.1 depending on feedback.)
Yes. Sigh. If t
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Given that people are waiting for 1.10, I'd like to postpone all
these changes to after the release, and aim for 1.11 shortly afterward.
(Maybe skipping 1.10.1 depending on feedback.)
RW> addressing the "deleted .m4 file" problem:
RW> http
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
RW> There are two possible ways to go: try to move the -M flags to the
RW> end at the compile stage (to fool the c89 wrapper and still use fastdep
RW> mode), or do the test with the flags added earlier on the command line.
RW> Not
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
RW> And your observation seems another hint to that end.
RW> I think this is what we should do. OK to apply?
OK. (And I see THANKS was updated here, so disregard my note in
another response.)
Thanks
RW> 2006-10-14 Ralf Wildenhu
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RW> Updated patches (added test for no-dependencies), plus an additional
RW> typo in the manual. OK?
Yes please.
RW> Cheers,
RW> Ralf
RW> 2006-10-14 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RW> * automake.in (%_macro_for_cond): New va
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
RW> 2006-10-14 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RW> * automake.in: For preprocessed assembler, add `$(DEFS)
RW> $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES)' to the compile rule.
RW> * doc/automake.texi (Assembly Support): Update.
RW> *
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
RW> OK to apply?
Sure. Thanks.
RW> 2006-10-09 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RW> * automake.in (handle_LIBOBJS_or_ALLOCA): If we are in the
RW> LIBOBJDIR, then we should not add a DEPDIR prefix.
RW> * tests/pr401.test:
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
RW> * tests/trace.test: New test for autom4te preselections.
RW> * tests/Makefile.am: Update.
I'd rather not have this test in Automake. If we add a new
trace to Automake today, fixing the test so it doesn't fail with
old CVS Autoc
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
RW> 2006-10-10 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RW> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RW> * automake.in ($seen_gettext_intl): New variable.
RW> (handle_gettext): Consider it.
RW> (scan_autoconf_traces): Add AM_GNU_GETTEXT_IN
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RW> I'm pretty sure users will be confused about this error message --
RW> I even was. I think the one below would be a bit better.
RW> One open issue with this is that the multiline warning isn't nicely
RW> prefixed with everywhere:
>
>>> "PE" == Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PE> 2006-10-10 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PE> * lib/install-sh (posix_mkdir): Reject FreeBSD 6.1 mkdir -p -m,
PE> which incorrectly sets the mode of an existing destination
PE> directory. In some cases the unpatched install-sh could
>>> "GK" == Geoffrey Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GK> 2006-09-14 Geoffrey Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GK> * m4/multi.m4: Non-default multilibs may be cross compilation.
Thanks, I've applied that.
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Shared books are happy books. http://www.bookcrossing.com/fr
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 09:18 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> [ Cc: automake-patches ]
>
> * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 06:36:12AM CEST:
> > On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 22:02 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:12:33AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > > with
Salut Alexandre, all,
For your convenience, I have compiled a list of pending patches against
Automake again, very roughly in what I regard decreasing priority, and
without guarantee of completeness (I've tried):
support cross multilibs (Geoffrey Keating):
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automa
I've pushed my collection of typo fixes out again.
2006-10-14 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* automake.in: Fix some typos in comments.
* lib/Automake/Variable.pm: Likewise.
Index: automake.in
===
RCS file: /c
[ http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2006-08/msg00073.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2006-09/msg00013.html ]
Hello again, and sorry for the delay,
For now I've backed down the previous plans a bit. The FCFLAGS_* are
most important for the extensions .f9
[ http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2006-09/msg5.html
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=automake&pr=480
]
Apologies for the long delay.
Just to decouple this from other Fortran changes, here's the previous
proposed patch with
[ Cc: automake-patches ]
* Ralf Corsepius wrote on Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 06:36:12AM CEST:
> On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 22:02 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:12:33AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > with automake-cvs/HEAD, and using *.S, CPPASCOMPILE doesn't apply
> > > $(D
26 matches
Mail list logo
