* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 10:46:40AM CET:
The current patch still has a couple of warts in that --silent-rules
should turn off portability-recursive warnings independently of the
command line argument order. This is another reason I don't like this
addition much: it
On Wednesday 2009-03-11 21:06, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 10:46:40AM CET:
The current patch still has a couple of warts in that --silent-rules
should turn off portability-recursive warnings independently of the
command line argument order. This is
* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:34:20PM CET:
On Wednesday 2009-03-11 21:06, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Do we want to allow a command line knob (--silent-rules) to turn
off `silent' mode, or do we force developers to either touch the
AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS variable in Makefile.am
On Wednesday 2009-03-11 22:43, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:34:20PM CET:
On Wednesday 2009-03-11 21:06, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Do we want to allow a command line knob (--silent-rules) to turn
off `silent' mode, or do we force developers to either
