* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:12:23PM CEST:
> Maybe we should also say that using TESTS_ENVIRONMENT to define a custom
> test runner is now not only strongly deprecated (as it already was I hope),
No it wasn't. "test runner" is not a term I would recognize, btw.
> but also
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:58:05PM CEST:
> On Monday 20 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > For example the parallel BSD makes tend to reuse shells for running
> > the recipe commands;
> >
> But only for the commands in the same recipe, right?
I think not.
> > I'm not
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:59:57PM CEST:
> On Monday 20 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:05:45PM CEST:
> > > sc_tests_plain_automake:
> > > - @if grep -v '^#' $(srcdir)/tests/*.test | grep -E ':[
> > > ]*automak
On Monday 20 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:05:45PM CEST:
> > * Makefile.am (sc_tests_plain_aclocal, sc_tests_plain_perl,
> > sc_tests_plain_autoconf, sc_tests_plain_automake,
> > sc_tests_plain_autoupate): Be stricter in matching an erroneo
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:05:45PM CEST:
> * Makefile.am (sc_tests_plain_aclocal, sc_tests_plain_perl,
> sc_tests_plain_autoconf, sc_tests_plain_automake,
> sc_tests_plain_autoupate): Be stricter in matching an erroneous
> literal command, i.e., `aclocal', `automake', `per
On Monday 20 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Jim Meyering wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:29:50PM CEST:
> > Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > One thing I've regularly done with new code that is not 100% backward
> > > compatible is have a new Automake option for them. That is exactly why
> > > t
On Monday 20 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:26:06PM CEST:
> > On Monday 20 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > Why not just split the whole documentation change into a followup patch
> > > then?
> > >
> > Because that wo
On Monday 20 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:22:28AM CEST:
> > [Adding bug-grep, dropping bug-coreutils and automake-patches]
>
> re-adding the latter.
>
> > I've noticed that grep uses a definition of TESTS_ENVIRONMENT very similar
> > to
* Jim Meyering wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:29:50PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > One thing I've regularly done with new code that is not 100% backward
> > compatible is have a new Automake option for them. That is exactly why
> > there is a 'parallel-tests': it is not fully compatible wi
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:29:02PM CEST:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:33:53AM CEST:
> > +# Prefix each line by 'col' and terminate each with 'std', for coloring.
> > +# Multi line coloring is problematic with "less -R", so we really need
> > +# to c
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:26:06PM CEST:
> On Monday 20 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Why not just split the whole documentation change into a followup patch
> > then?
> >
> Because that would only postpone, not avoid, the continous tweaking and
> amen
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:22:28AM CEST:
>> [Adding bug-grep, dropping bug-coreutils and automake-patches]
>
> re-adding the latter.
>
>> I've noticed that grep uses a definition of TESTS_ENVIRONMENT very similar
>> to that of coreutils (the one we
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:33:53AM CEST:
> OK, I've amended the patch on Bert's behalf, as he can't do that himself
> at the moment. Attached is what I've pushed (to maint).
Thanks for handling this, and to Bert for the report and patch!
Minor nit:
> --- a/lib/am/check
On Monday 20 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 09:33:13AM CEST:
> > On Friday 17 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > > Actually, why not s/testcase/test/g globally in all your text.
> > >
> > Because I'm trying to make a distinction between
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:22:28AM CEST:
> [Adding bug-grep, dropping bug-coreutils and automake-patches]
re-adding the latter.
> I've noticed that grep uses a definition of TESTS_ENVIRONMENT very similar
> to that of coreutils (the one we've just fixed), so it will brea
On Thursday 16 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> This refactoring should cause no API of functionality change,
> and is meant only to simplify the future implementation of TAP
> and SubUnit testsuite drivers. More precisely, our roadmap is
> to move most of the "testsuite driving" features out
* tests/depmod-data.test: Use creative quoting to avoid
spuriously triggering the `sc_tests_Exit_not_exit' maintainer
check. Commit `v1.11-900-g3453b8e' attempted to fix it, but
succeeded only partially.
* tests/cond33.test: Fix header comments, not to reference
obsolescent make variable `$(mkdir_
* Makefile.am (sc_tests_plain_aclocal, sc_tests_plain_perl,
sc_tests_plain_autoconf, sc_tests_plain_automake,
sc_tests_plain_autoupate): Be stricter in matching an erroneous
literal command, i.e., `aclocal', `automake', `perl', etc.
---
ChangeLog |8
Makefile.am | 10 +-
M
On Friday 17 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Hi Bert, and thanks again for your patch.
>
> I have some minor observations and objections below (please do not take
> them as a belittling of your work; they are either constructive criticism,
> or requests for cosmetic changes mandated by the G
On Saturday 18 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 June 2011, Eric Blake wrote:
>
> [CUT]
>
> Here is the amended patch. Note that in the end I haven't made use of
> the version information I've asked Eric previously, since adding it would
> have broken the flow of discourse IMHO
On Thursday 16 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On Thursday 16 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> > Hi Bob.
> >
> > On Thursday 16 June 2011, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> > > >>
> > > > Problem: it seems that there are few (and luckily only f
21 matches
Mail list logo
