* configure.ac (AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE): Don't explicitly require a minimal
automake version number. Since the Automake build system is only meant
to work with the bleeding-edge automake, that requirement was redundant
and misleading.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com
---
It is only from version 2.69 that the 'AC_PROG_FC' macro has started to
set the '$GFC' variable to yes if the selected Fortran compiler is a
GNU compiler. Since we use this variable in our configure.ac, we better
require autoconf 2.69 explicitly.
* configure.ac (AC_PRERQ): Require autoconf =
This will avoid a lot of useless conflicts or botched merges in the
NEWS file. These have already happened many times with our old setup
where there was just one NEWS files.
* NEWS: Removed, split into ...
* NEWS.maint, old/NEWS: ... these two files.
* NEWS.master: New file, still empty (it will
Hi Thien-Thi, thanks for the report and the patch.
On 04/26/2012 11:45 AM, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
Automake 1.12 make check reported only one FAIL, which I traced
to a strange value for var 'd' in t/remake11.sh, leaking in from
the environment.
Do you have an environment variable named 'd'?
() Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com
() Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:33:08 +0200
Do you have an environment variable named 'd'? I like
minimalism, but this seems a little over-the-top ;-)
I live in Emacs and ‘C-x C-f $ d RET’ is a nice way to get there
quickly. Attached is
Hi Eric, sorry for the delay.
On 04/25/2012 01:25 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
Actually, this appears to make _all_ the XFile uses work; all that
remains broken is places such as bin/autoupdate.in calling raw open
instead of using XFile.
diff --git i/lib/Autom4te/XFile.pm w/lib/Autom4te/XFile.pm
[dropping bug-automake, adding automake-patches]
On 04/26/2012 01:56 PM, Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
because you should still have the paperwork from the ObjC++ integration.
I wasn't involved in the project yet back then, so I wasn't aware you
On 04/26/2012 12:10 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Severity: minor
Reference: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11306#11
On 04/22/2012 08:10 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
[SNIP]
Modifying a test apparently requires me to have the same exact Autoconf
version (2.68) as you did. What
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
On 04/26/2012 01:56 PM, Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
but could also apply them to the current git version and send you these.
Please do. If they are not-invasive, they could appear in 1.12.1.
Hi Stefano,
attached are six patches. The first
On 04/26/2012 03:30 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
This will avoid a lot of useless conflicts or botched merges in the
NEWS file. These have already happened many times with our old setup
where there was just one NEWS files.
* NEWS: Removed, split into ...
* NEWS.maint, old/NEWS: ... these
On 04/26/2012 05:12 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Hi Eric, sorry for the delay.
On 04/25/2012 01:25 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
Actually, this appears to make _all_ the XFile uses work; all that
remains broken is places such as bin/autoupdate.in calling raw open
instead of using XFile.
diff
On 04/26/2012 07:10 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
And here is a patch. The change itself is obvious, but I'd like a review
on the long-winded commit message. I will push by tomorrow if there is no
review by then.
The described situation could hinder hinder on-field testing or
Hi Eric, thanks for the feedback.
On 04/26/2012 04:17 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 04/26/2012 03:30 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
This will avoid a lot of useless conflicts or botched merges in the
NEWS file. These have already happened many times with our old setup
where there was just one NEWS
On 04/26/2012 09:14 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Now that we only have 'master' and 'maint' as long-lived branches
(ok, there's 'ng/master' as well, but there we have a separated
file 'NG-NEWS'), the NEWS changes should merge and sync easily and
cleanly.
So I wish to take back my proposed
[SNIP]
Eric Blake wrote:
Alas, my perl-fu is weak enough that I'm not sure how good my
unit-testing attempts would be. But moving the files to a common
repository seems doable (how about gnulib?).
I replied:
This could be a good interim solution, as I the paperwork in place for
Gnulib,
On 04/26/2012 05:17 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 04/26/2012 09:14 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Now that we only have 'master' and 'maint' as long-lived branches
(ok, there's 'ng/master' as well, but there we have a separated
file 'NG-NEWS'), the NEWS changes should merge and sync easily and
tags 11347 + patch
close 11347
thanks
On 04/26/2012 04:28 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 04/26/2012 07:10 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
And here is a patch. The change itself is obvious, but I'd like a review
on the long-winded commit message.
[SNIP] useful review
I've addressed all you nits, and
17 matches
Mail list logo
