At Tuesday 08 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 01:31:00AM CEST:
At Monday 07 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues addr...@elided wrote:
BTW, is gmail configurable to not quote the email address in the
tag line?
Dunno, I usually use KMail as my mail
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 10:00:23PM CEST:
At Sunday 06 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
The patch is still not right, so I'm not pushing it. A generated
test foo-p.test now needs to depend upon foo.test,
this is not reflected in the makefile.
Right :-(
And
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:07:19PM CEST:
What about the attached new try? It just complicates the generated
tests a little bit, but this is a more than fair tradeoff IMO.
That looks like a better idea to me. However, 'return' from a script
sourced with
At Sunday 06 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de
wrote:
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:07:19PM CEST:
What about the attached new try? It just complicates the
generated tests a little bit, but this is a more than fair
tradeoff IMO.
That
At Sunday 06 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de
wrote:
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:07:19PM CEST:
What about the attached new try? It just complicates the
generated tests a little bit, but this is a more than fair
tradeoff IMO.
That
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:13:48PM CEST:
At Sunday 06 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:07:19PM CEST:
What about the attached new try? It just complicates the
generated tests a little bit, but this is a more
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:50:57PM CEST:
At Sunday 06 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Thanks, and sorry for not having rerun the complete testsuite
before pushing the original patch.
Well, I should say sorry for not having tested the patch thoroughly.
The
At Sunday 06 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:50:57PM CEST:
At Sunday 06 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Thanks, and sorry for not having rerun the complete testsuite
before pushing the original patch.
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, May 23, 2010 at 05:51:15PM CEST:
Here it is my attempt to a patch.
Thanks. This seems to work ok, but this:
+# Protect against attempted multiple inclusions of this file.
+# This might be especially useful in generated test scripts.
+echo 'echo
At Thursday 03 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de
wrote:
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, May 23, 2010 at 05:51:15PM CEST:
Here it is my attempt to a patch.
Thanks. This seems to work ok, but this:
+# Protect against attempted multiple inclusions of this
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 05:15:24PM CET:
Generated tests are now just a thin layer around other tests.
* tests/Makefile.am: Rewrite the rule to generate the `*-p.test'
test scripts so that any of them simply includes the corresponding
`*.test' script (after setting
At Sunday 23 May 2010, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
Got lucky and intuition saved me from regressing branch-1.11 with
this one. I'm applying the fix below on top of this patch and
merging to master. The nontrivial point to note is that in the
wrapper script, srcdir needs
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, May 23, 2010 at 03:01:20PM CEST:
At Sunday 23 May 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Got lucky and intuition saved me from regressing branch-1.11 with
this one. I'm applying the fix below on top of this patch and
merging to master. The nontrivial point to
At Sunday 23 May 2010, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
Good catch. Note that my patch on the sepration of instspc.test
has this same problem too.
OK, good to know. I haven't looked at the instspc patches yet.
Then I'll amend it after this problem will have been solved.
Here it is my attempt to a patch.
Regards,
Stefano
From 9f43423626ad1c68ee0ba8451fe809f70be3f223 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 17:44:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix distcheck failure with distributed generated parallel tests.
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:11:16PM CEST:
Generated tests are now just a thin layer around other tests.
* tests/Makefile.am: Rewrite the rule to generate the `*-p.test'
test scripts so that any of them simply includes the corresponding
`*.test' script (after
Another simple patch in the style of the one which removed `defs-p'
(and which, in fact, is suggested and made possible by that removal).
-*-*-
Generated tests are now just a thin layer around other tests.
* tests/Makefile.am: Rewrite the rule to generate the `*-p.test'
test scripts so that any
17 matches
Mail list logo
