On Friday 01 July 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> While working on the next patch (which introduces a more rational testsuite
> summary report), I have made the `color*.test' tests even stricter (see
> attachements); and I think that it would be useful to have these stricter
> versions in this ear
While working on the next patch (which introduces a more rational testsuite
summary report), I have made the `color*.test' tests even stricter (see
attachements); and I think that it would be useful to have these stricter
versions in this earlier change already. I have thus amended the present
pat
On Thursday 30 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> I've applied the attached patch to the 'GSoC/experimental/test-results-work'
> branch Note that this is not an FYI, since that branch is temporary, and can
> thus be amended and modified. Reviews are welcome!
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
And con
lanced -- so, if you have
any suggestion, shoot.
> Changing semantics requires a NEWS entry. It's actually an
> incompatibility, but a very minor one, so it's not a big problem.
>
Still a NEWS entry is a good idea anyway; what about what I've
done in the attached squash-in?
ing different terms where and when we can.
Changing semantics requires a NEWS entry. It's actually an
incompatibility, but a very minor one, so it's not a big problem.
Thanks,
Ralf
> Subject: [PATCH] parallel-tests: new recognized test result 'ERROR'
>
> * l
7 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <2df72384ab57d165c7e1da0f88e513171a0035e8.1309445709.git.stefano.lattar...@gmail.com>
From: Stefano Lattarini
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:55:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] parallel-tests: new recognized test result 'ERROR'
* lib/am/check.am ($(TEST_SUITE_LOG
