Re: [PATCH 0/2] Tests initialization: put default definition of AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR in the pre-populated configure.in.

2010-12-13 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Monday 13 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 02:52:18PM CET: This is a reproposal of an older patch of mine: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-05/msg8.html

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Tests initialization: put default definition of AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR in the pre-populated configure.in.

2010-12-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 09:42:08PM CET: On Monday 13 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: I'm undecided on this one. On the one hand, the safety increase is a plus, but on the other hand, the tests become less readable, if only because it is less obvious what is

[PATCH 0/2] Tests initialization: put default definition of AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR in the pre-populated configure.in.

2010-12-11 Thread Stefano Lattarini
This is a reproposal of an older patch of mine: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-05/msg8.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-05/msg9.html -*-*- Hello automakers. I see that some tests explicitly put a call like: AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([.])