* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:55:02PM CET:
On Wednesday 2009-03-11 22:43, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
The command line option --silent-rules does the same as the argument
`silent' to the AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE macro in configure.ac:
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([silent])
Both enable silent
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 10:46:40AM CET:
The current patch still has a couple of warts in that --silent-rules
should turn off portability-recursive warnings independently of the
command line argument order. This is another reason I don't like this
addition much: it
On Wednesday 2009-03-11 21:06, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 10:46:40AM CET:
The current patch still has a couple of warts in that --silent-rules
should turn off portability-recursive warnings independently of the
command line argument order. This is
* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:34:20PM CET:
On Wednesday 2009-03-11 21:06, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Do we want to allow a command line knob (--silent-rules) to turn
off `silent' mode, or do we force developers to either touch the
AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS variable in Makefile.am
On Wednesday 2009-03-11 22:43, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:34:20PM CET:
On Wednesday 2009-03-11 21:06, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Do we want to allow a command line knob (--silent-rules) to turn
off `silent' mode, or do we force developers to either
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Ralf Corsepius wrote on Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 03:57:58PM CET:
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Monday 2009-03-09 15:44, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
For this patch, I'm unsure if we should even add it at all.
FWIW: I am opposed to it.
I suppose you are
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
For this patch, I'm unsure if we should even add it at all.
It adds an automake option to enable silent build rules.
Here's why I wrote it in the first place: if you are a distribution
and want to change all your packages to build silently, you may not
want to change
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Monday 2009-03-09 15:44, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
For this patch, I'm unsure if we should even add it at all.
FWIW: I am opposed to it.
All this silencing stuff does is to add further potential sources of errors.
Which ones,
On Monday 2009-03-09 15:57, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
For this patch, I'm unsure if we should even add it at all.
FWIW: I am opposed to it.
All this silencing stuff does is to add further potential sources of errors.
Which ones, please?
Those yet to be discovered.
Oh what great
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Monday 2009-03-09 15:57, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
For this patch, I'm unsure if we should even add it at all.
FWIW: I am opposed to it.
All this silencing stuff does is to add further potential sources of errors.
Which ones,
On Monday 2009-03-09 16:10, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
For this patch, I'm unsure if we should even add it at all.
FWIW: I am opposed to it.
All this silencing stuff does is to add further potential sources of
errors.
Which ones, please?
Those yet to be discovered.
Oh what
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Monday 2009-03-09 16:10, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
For this patch, I'm unsure if we should even add it at all.
FWIW: I am opposed to it.
All this silencing stuff does is to add further potential sources of
errors.
Which ones, please?
On Monday 2009-03-09 16:54, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
which has some similar silent mode too (by default even!)...
Correct. that's one of cmake's sillynesses. It hides away the silent bugs a
package suffers from.
Potential bugs in the command line invoking $CC that automake generates
just go
* Ralf Corsepius wrote on Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 03:57:58PM CET:
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Monday 2009-03-09 15:44, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
For this patch, I'm unsure if we should even add it at all.
FWIW: I am opposed to it.
I suppose you are opposed to the whole topic,
Hi,
Jan Engelhardt jeng...@medozas.de writes:
On Monday 2009-03-09 15:57, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
For this patch, I'm unsure if we should even add it at all.
FWIW: I am opposed to it.
All this silencing stuff does is to add further potential sources of
errors.
Which ones,
For this patch, I'm unsure if we should even add it at all.
It adds an automake option to enable silent build rules.
Here's why I wrote it in the first place: if you are a distribution
and want to change all your packages to build silently, you may not
want to change each package's configure.ac
16 matches
Mail list logo
