Re: [Ping PATCHES] {master} Optimize tests `instspc-*.test' for speed.

2011-02-15 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Monday 14 February 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Stefano, a while ago ... * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 06:38:50PM CET: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-11/msg00152.html

[PATCH] test defs: add subroutine for input unindenting (was: Re: [Ping PATCHES] {master} Optimize tests `instspc-*.test' for speed.)

2011-02-15 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Tuesday 15 February 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: On Monday 14 February 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Stefano, a while ago ... * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 06:38:50PM CET: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-11/msg00152.html

Re: [Ping PATCHES] {master} Optimize tests `instspc-*.test' for speed.

2011-02-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:21:36AM CET: On Monday 14 February 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/instspc-data.test +# Helper testcase which generate input data for the other test +# `instspc-*.test'. It basically delegates the work to

Re: [Ping PATCHES] {master} Optimize tests `instspc-*.test' for speed.

2011-02-14 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Stefano, a while ago ... * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 06:38:50PM CET: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-11/msg00152.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-12/msg6.html OK for master? Both are OK, with nits