[bug#67670] [PATCH] Revise tests for file mtime resolution again.

2024-01-23 Thread Karl Berry
Guess it's time to close this one about the subsecond mtimes, and we'll see what happens next time. (For reference: see also https://bugs.gnu.org/68325 where we don't try for a millisecond any more ...)

[bug#67670] [PATCH] Revise tests for file mtime resolution again.

2023-12-25 Thread Karl Berry
One more follow-up on this. As we saw from the bug reports for the 1.16i pretest (67894, 67918), the random parallelization failures were back after this, when autom4te did not support subsecond-mtimes. As far as I could tell, what was needed was to add am_cv_sleep_fractional_seconds=false

[bug#67670] [PATCH] Revise tests for file mtime resolution again.

2023-12-10 Thread Karl Berry
In order for the Automake testsuite to be able to use sub-second delays [...] I installed the patch (plus a tweak to NEWS). (make check and distcheck ran fine for me, including using the subsecond feature.) I included all the commentary from your message, Zack, since I thought it would

[bug#67670] [PATCH] Revise tests for file mtime resolution again.

2023-12-07 Thread Karl Berry
Thanks so much, Zack. I will review and apply, most likely tomorrow. -k

[bug#67670] [PATCH] Revise tests for file mtime resolution again.

2023-12-06 Thread Zack Weinberg
In order for the Automake testsuite to be able to use sub-second delays to control whether certain files are considered newer than others, five(!) separate pieces of software all need to cooperate: automake itself, autoconf’s internal “autom4te” utility, the Perl interpreter and its libraries, the