Re: User extensions

[off-list] Reviving an oldish thread... Reference: On Monday 01 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Valentin David wrote on Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:41:47PM CET: > > I hope I will be able to prepare the new patches

Re: User extensions

On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:36:16PM CET: > > But it's not like I have a "silver bullet" to write proper tests > > which attain complete branch coverage; I just proceed by "common > > sense", trying to maximize such covera

Re: User extensions

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:36:16PM CET: > But it's not like I have a "silver bullet" to write proper tests > which attain complete branch coverage; I just proceed by "common > sense", trying to maximize such coverage. That's all, sadly. A while ago I posted instructions

Re: User extensions

Hello Pippijn. On Saturday 13 November 2010, Pippijn van wrote: > On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:18:44PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Ideally, I would like to see testsuite coverage for each code path > > ("branch coverage") for new code. I understand that only Stefano is > > able to produce thi

Re: User extensions

On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:18:44PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Ideally, I would like to see testsuite coverage for each code path > ("branch coverage") for new code. I understand that only Stefano is > able to produce this in reasonable amount of time, so whatever you guys > can manage is bett

Re: User extensions

* Valentin David wrote on Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:41:47PM CET: > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Also, I like the approach of calling the whole feature experimental and > > at the same time asking users to tell us which features from automake.in > > they need so we can do

Re: User extensions

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Valentin David wrote on Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 06:56:53PM CEST: >> * --libdir= can be called several times, the arguments can also have a >> list of paths separated by a colon. Empty paths correspond to the >> original libdir. > > Due to the

Re: User extensions

Hi Valentin, let's move to the -patches list. And sorry for the long delay. * Valentin David wrote on Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 06:56:53PM CEST: > I propose a patch as attached. > > * The lang_*_rewrite are added to the Language structure. The default > is lang_sub_obj. They do not return anymore th

Re: User extensions

gt; Hmm... looking at the git diffs, this seems like a useful refactoring > > by itself. Could this be done in separate, "preparatory" patch preceding > > the implementation of the "user extensions support" proper? > > Sure, I can make a series of patches l

Re: User extensions

this be done in separate, "preparatory" patch preceding > the implementation of the "user extensions support" proper? Sure, I can make a series of patches like that. But there might be also a lot of refactoring afterwards as well. For example language dependent code should pr

Re: User extensions

On Saturday 23 October 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Stefano, Valentin, > > please discuss patches on the -patches list; and please keep the > original poster in Cc:, thanks. > > I haven't looked at the patch in detail yet, but will, now that > the assignment papers are done (thanks!). >