Hi Ralf,
I am using your new --silent-rules option (from the je-silent branch)
in coreutils, albeit only privately for now.
I would like to make it permanent/public, and noticed that
this is not yet on next. Do you need more testimonials?
Anything I can do to help?
Thanks for yet another useful
From 15b94859da3b658182e4a334f85fbf8e0ddb6ce2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering meyer...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:09:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix a documentation typo.
* doc/automake.texi (Headers): Clarify the note telling when it's
better not to use noinst_HEADERS.
---
RW == Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de writes:
But the question remains: how do you think we should address the bug
that bothers Akim, other than by this patch and a big warning in NEWS?
My focus was more about an empty $(foodir), not an empty $(foo_DATA).
I was suggesting that it
RW == Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de writes:
Your rule can be simplified a lot: :-)
# Check that XFAIL tests do exist.
check-test-list-XFAIL: $(XFAIL_TESTS)
check-test-list-TFAIL: $(TFAIL_TESTS)
.PHONY: check-test-list-XFAIL check-test-list-TFAIL
Of course that will also
Hi Jim,
* Jim Meyering wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:24:40AM CET:
I am using your new --silent-rules option (from the je-silent branch)
in coreutils, albeit only privately for now.
I would like to make it permanent/public, and noticed that
this is not yet on next.
It should be, though:
$
