Hi Ralf. I still have one question (about `cp -f', see the end of
the mail); I will push once it's addressed ...
On Friday 17 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:10:29PM CET:
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello, and dropping automake@,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:27:43PM CET:
The list in `%standard_prefix' is used only for diagnosing invalid
primary/directory combinations, such as `data_PROGRAMS' or
[reviving and old thread]
Hello automakers. Ping on this?
Reference:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-09/msg00246.html
I've rebased the patch on latest maint, and successfully re-run the
testsuite (no failures with GNU make 3.82, only already-known failures
with Solaris
Hello Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 01:46:48PM CET:
Test `$(var:suf=rpl)' expansion in special automake variables.
* tests/posixsubst-data.test: New test.
[...]
* tests/posixsubst-scripts.test: Likewise.
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/posixsubst-scripts.test
@@
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 03:33:32PM CET:
On Friday 17 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
The *current* tests are good enough for the current code.
Yes, but not enough if we plan to modify that code
You can add tests as you go modifying the code. Doing that is
