Re: [PATCH] test defs: don't allow `$me' to be overridden from the environment

On Monday 18 April 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Monday 18 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > | > am_test_name is better, but doesn't explain either why it would be > > | > needed in the first place. > > | > > > | Second patch of: > > | > >

Re: New release wishlist

On Monday 18 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:07:14PM CEST: > > JFTR, here are the things that IMHO we must do for the next release: > > Right now, I'm aiming at 1.11.2, not 1.12. > Ah, I didn't get that. Consider my seggestions moot for wh

Re: [PATCH] test defs: don't allow `$me' to be overridden from the environment

On Monday 18 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 09:26:30PM CEST: > > On Monday 18 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:33:25AM CEST: > > > > Subject: [PATCH] test defs: don't allow `$me' to

Re: New release wishlist

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:07:14PM CEST: > JFTR, here are the things that IMHO we must do for the next release: Right now, I'm aiming at 1.11.2, not 1.12. The minimum for the former is *no* additional features. The important thing is no regressions, not really any new f

[PATCH] java: allow both dist_JAVA and nodist_JAVA in the same Makefile.am (was: Re: bug#8434: java: cannot use JAVA with both dist_ and nodist_ prefixes)

On Saturday 09 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 09:00:32PM CEST: > > Currently, limitations in the Automake support for java enforce the > > restriction that only one `_JAVA' primary can be used in a given > > Makefile.am. > >

Re: [PATCH] test defs: don't allow `$me' to be overridden from the environment

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 09:26:30PM CEST: > On Monday 18 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:33:25AM CEST: > > > Subject: [PATCH] test defs: don't allow `$me' to be overridden from the > > > environment > > > > > > *

Re: [PATCH] test defs: don't allow `$me' to be overridden from the environment

On Monday 18 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:33:25AM CEST: > > Subject: [PATCH] test defs: don't allow `$me' to be overridden from the > > environment > > > > * tests/defs.in ($me): Use the namespace-safe `$am_test_name' (if > > it's nonem

Re: [PATCH] test defs: don't allow `$me' to be overridden from the environment

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:33:25AM CEST: > Subject: [PATCH] test defs: don't allow `$me' to be overridden from the > environment > > * tests/defs.in ($me): Use the namespace-safe `$am_test_name' (if > it's nonempty) as the default for the initialization of `$me', so > th

New release wishlist (was: Re: [FYI] {maint, master} test defs: allow overriding of `$me')

On Monday 18 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:27:04AM CEST: > > On Monday 18 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 09:36:42PM CEST: > > > > > > > >

Re: [FYI] {maint,master} test defs: allow overriding of `$me'

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:27:04AM CEST: > On Monday 18 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 09:36:42PM CEST: > > > > > > > > > > That explains

Re: [FYI] {maint,master} test defs: allow overriding of `$me'

On Monday 18 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 09:36:42PM CEST: > > On Sunday 17 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > > am_test_name is better, but doesn't explain either why it would be > > > needed in the first place. >