Re: [PATCH] tests: use skip_ consistently.

2020-01-07 Thread Jim Meyering
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 6:25 PM Karl Berry wrote: > I belatedly noticed that I should have used skip_ instead of exit 77 > in my new too-old-Emacs test. Plus found a wrong occurrence of just > "skip" without the _ in uninstall-fail.sh. Look ok? Good catches both. I noticed this added line:

[PATCH] tests: use skip_ consistently.

2020-01-07 Thread Karl Berry
I belatedly noticed that I should have used skip_ instead of exit 77 in my new too-old-Emacs test. Plus found a wrong occurrence of just "skip" without the _ in uninstall-fail.sh. Look ok? (uninstall-fail has more failures in the case of a newer File::Path, due to changes in rmtree as used in