On Monday 09 May 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> [ apologies if you receive this multiple times ]
>
> Hi Stefano,
>
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, May 07, 2011 at 03:02:02PM CEST:
> > * tests/txinfo21.test: Use the `is_newest' subroutine instead of
> > the `ls -t' hack to to determine whether
[ apologies if you receive this multiple times ]
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, May 07, 2011 at 03:02:02PM CEST:
> * tests/txinfo21.test: Use the `is_newest' subroutine instead of
> the `ls -t' hack to to determine whether a file has been updated.
> This is required because at leas
* tests/txinfo21.test: Use the `is_newest' subroutine instead of
the `ls -t' hack to to determine whether a file has been updated.
This is required because at least FreeBSD `ls' do not sort files
with the same timestamp in alphabetical order when using the `-t'
option.
---
ChangeLog |
