* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:15:12AM CET:
On Monday 15 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Well then we should adjust maintainer-check to not complain. Either
way, maintainer-check results should not deteriorate.
I'm not keen on meddling with the current
On Saturday 20 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:15:12AM CET:
On Monday 15 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Well then we should adjust maintainer-check to not complain. Either
way, maintainer-check results should not
On Monday 15 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 02:37:13AM CET:
On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:59:22AM CEST:
But since we are at it, we can do better, extending
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:59:22AM CEST:
But since we are at it, we can do better, extending coverage and
making existing tests more semantic. See the attached patch (for
maint).
ansi2knr is a really dying (and ugly) feature; when have we last seen
a
On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:59:22AM CEST:
But since we are at it, we can do better, extending coverage and
making existing tests more semantic. See the attached patch (for
maint).
ansi2knr is a
Pinging this patch again, following this:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-11/msg3.html
There should be no need to rebase the patch (which is based off of maint),
so that I should just be able to merge it to master from the copy in my
local automake repository (maybe
