On Saturday 18 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 10:35:43AM CET:
On Saturday 18 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
+# Try also with `:=', to ensure the parser is not unduly confused
+# into thinking that it's an unportable
On Saturday 18 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 01:46:48PM CET:
Test `$(var:suf=rpl)' expansion in special automake variables.
* tests/posixsubst-data.test: New test.
[...]
* tests/posixsubst-scripts.test:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 10:35:43AM CET:
On Saturday 18 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
+# Try also with `:=', to ensure the parser is not unduly confused
+# into thinking that it's an unportable assignement operator.
This comment is bogus, right? There
Hello Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 01:46:48PM CET:
Test `$(var:suf=rpl)' expansion in special automake variables.
* tests/posixsubst-data.test: New test.
[...]
* tests/posixsubst-scripts.test: Likewise.
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/posixsubst-scripts.test
@@
On Thursday 09 December 2010, Eric Blake wrote:
On 12/09/2010 05:46 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Another testsuite-enhancing patch, based off of maint and intended for
master.
Tested with Solaris 10 XPG4 make, Solaris 10 CCS make, Solaris 10 dmake,
Heirloom make, GNU make from 3.79 up
On 12/09/2010 05:46 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Another testsuite-enhancing patch, based off of maint and intended for
master.
Tested with Solaris 10 XPG4 make, Solaris 10 CCS make, Solaris 10 dmake,
Heirloom make, GNU make from 3.79 up to 3.82, with the Debian ports of
NetBSD make and
